Featured Product

    NGFS Examines Progress in Integrating Climate Risks into Supervision

    October 26, 2021

    The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report that examines the progress made by NGFS supervisors in integrating climate‑related and environmental risks into their supervisory activities. The analysis uses, as a reference, the five recommendations of the NGFS Guide for Supervisors, which was published in May 2020. The progress report provides an updated and granular guidance structured around twelve Focus Areas and supported by case studies on global supervisory practices. This report is part of the NGFS’ contribution to the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26), which is to be held in Glasgow next month.

    The examined Focus Areas span supervisory scope, strategy, and organizations framework; risk transmission and assessment; development and implementation of supervisory expectations; and supervisory expectations with regard to disclosures. The presented case studies illustrate how the Focus Areas have been put into practice, showcase good practices, and importantly support supervisors in their ambition to go further and faster. The report also includes a deeper dive into the areas of environmental risks and disclosures. The report was informed by a survey of the NGFS supervisors in early 2021 and by another survey on disclosure requirements and practices of supervised institutions in late 2020. 

    The results show that most supervisors (94%) have progressed in developing a clear strategy while 64% of supervisors have already implemented or are in the process of implementing climate‑related risks assessments. Nearly 78% of supervisors have included climate‑related risks in their supervisory activities in one form or another, with many of them having engaged with financial institutions under their supervision to better understand their climate‑related risks exposures. However, the understanding and measurement of environmental risks more broadly are still at a nascent stage. Progress made by supervisors in terms of setting supervisory expectations for climate‑related and environmental risk management has significantly accelerated since 2019, with 83% having developed or developing supervisory expectations for climate‑related risks and 59% for environmental risks. Nevertheless, supervisors have made less headway in effectively integrating these risks into their set of formal and binding supervisory tools, although most of them report ongoing actions or plans to do so.

    Through the progress report and upcoming initiatives, NGFS can facilitate a continual uplift in supervisory capabilities and convergence of global supervisory practices. Notably, a multi-year capacity building program is being rolled out for NGFS members and will contribute to global efforts—namely the Climate Training Alliance coordinated under the COP26 agenda. In line with the priorities identified in this progress report, NGFS is planning work on the following areas to better support supervisors:

    • Launching a capacity building initiative to address the needs expressed by supervisors in implementing practices highlighted in the NGFS Guide, this progress report, and other NGFS material. 
    • Continuing its work to identify and prioritize data needs, enhance the availability, reliability and comparability of climate‑related data and develop policy recommendations to bridge the data gaps identified. A final report will be published toward the end of the year.
    • Deepening its work on risk assessment methodologies and metrics, including building on the second iteration of NGFS scenarios. On the Phase II NGFS scenarios, further work will be undertaken to provide additional sectoral granularity, while  building on case studies to inform their practical application.
    • Further examining risk differentials between green and non‑green assets, which may contribute to the review of regulatory frameworks that many of its members and observers are conducting or intend to conduct in the coming years.
    • Continuing to explore, via the Joint NGFS‑INSPIRE Study Group on Biodiversity and Financial Stability, whether and how central banks and supervisors can, within the remit of their mandates, play a role in addressing the risks posed by biodiversity loss and the knowledge gaps around it.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Climate Change Risk, Disclosures, COP 26, ESG, Guidance, NGFS

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Finalizes Guidance on Management of Climate Change Risks

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.

    November 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Single Rulebook Q&A Updates in November 2021

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.

    November 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Proposes New Measures Under Capital Markets Union Package

    The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.

    November 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    European Council Adopts Position on Digital Finance Package Proposals

    The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).

    November 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposes Rulebook Changes; BoE Extends BEEDS Testing Window

    The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.

    November 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Outlines Lending Conditions and Supervisory Activities in H1 2021

    The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.

    November 24, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Standards to Calculate Risk-Weights of CIUs Under CRR

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

    November 24, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Expects Boards to Strengthen Ability to Oversee Cyber Resilience

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.

    November 23, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7736