MAS published a report on the thematic assessment of credit review standards and practices of corporate lending business. The assessment found that the banks had established policies and processes to monitor and manage the exposures of their corporate borrowers. However, there is room to improve the robustness of their credit grading, credit monitoring, and portfolio management processes.
MAS conducted the thematic review between October 2016 and June 2017. The thematic review focused on assessing the following for banks:
- Credit grading standards and practices against the credit grading requirements under MAS Notice 612 on Credit Files, Grading, and Provisioning
- Credit monitoring framework and controls
- Loan portfolio management framework and processes
The review found that while the Notice 612 sets out both quantitative and qualitative criteria for credit grading, there were instances where banks had placed stronger emphasis on quantitative factors, such as repayment conduct, in determining the credit grade without adequate consideration of the qualitative factors. There were also instances of restructured loans not being classified appropriately in line with the requirements of the Notice. The watch-list process could be enhanced for more effective identification and management of accounts, with signs of credit weaknesses.
On portfolio management, some banks did not conduct adequate credit stress tests on a regular and timely basis to assess the impact of economic shocks or worrying trends in the local operating environment. Stress test scenarios should also be enhanced to incorporate macroeconomic and industry trends. Furthermore, as credit grades could be one of the inputs used to determine the amount of loan-loss provisions under FRS 109, banks should ensure that their credit grading standards are sufficiently robust. Notwithstanding that the general credit environment has improved, banks should continue to strengthen their credit review standards and practices.
Additionally, some banks conducted a post-mortem on non-performing loans (NPLs) to identify reasons for their deterioration and determine whether there were preemptive actions that could have been taken before the loans turned non-performing. The post-mortem was generally performed by units that were independent of the business such as internal audit and remedial management. The outcome of the reviews was reported to senior management, which would ensure that appropriate and timely actions were taken to rectify the noted weaknesses.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, NPLs, MAS Notice 612, Stress Testing, Corporate Lending, FRS 109, Credit Risk, Credit Grading, MAS
Previous ArticleCBB Proposes and Finalizes Rulebook Modules for Banks in August 2018
Next ArticleOCC Updates Bank Accounting Advisory Series
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.