ESAs issued a supervisory statement to promote consistent application, by national competent authorities, of the scope of the regulation for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs Regulation) to bond markets. The supervisory statement seeks to mitigate the risk of divergent application, by national competent authorities, for determining the type of bonds for which it is necessary to draw up a Key Information Document (KID). The Annex to the statement provides guidance on the practical application of the provisions determining the scope of the PRIIPs Regulation.
In the view of ESAs, uncertainty over application of the PRIIPs Regulation to bonds has led to negative consequences for functioning of bond markets and for access to these markets by retail investors. There are also risks of divergent applications, by national competent authorities, with negative consequences for achieving uniform levels of retail investor protection and a level playing field among product manufacturers and distributors within the EU. To promote a consistent application of the scope of the PRIIPs Regulation to bond markets, ESAs recommend that national competent authorities apply the guidance set out in the Annex to the statement when supervising compliance with the requirements in Chapter I of the PRIIPs Regulation. To fully address the risk of divergent applications by national competent authorities, ESAs recommend that during the upcoming review of the PRIIPs Regulation, the co-legislators introduce amendments to the Regulation to more precisely specify which financial instruments fall within the scope of the regulation. The overall objective of this statement is to achieve a high, effective, and consistent level of regulation and national supervision while promoting a level playing field and the protection of retail investors.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Banking, Securities, PRIIPs, PRIIPs Regulation, Bonds, KID, Supervisory Statement, ESAs
Previous ArticleCFTC Proposes to Amend Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.