ECB released the updated list of supervised entities in the EU, with the current number of significant supervised entities being 118. The list displays the significant (part A) and less significant credit institutions (part B), which are supervised entities.
ECB reviews certain parameters that determine whether a credit institution or a group fulfills any of the significance criteria according to the SSM Framework Regulation (EU Regulation No 468/2014). In the SSM Framework Regulation, the types of supervised banks are referred to as credit institutions, financial holding companies, mixed financial holding companies, and branches of credit institutions established in non-participating member states. ECB updates this list regularly and the list reflects status of banks at the given cut-off date. The current cut-off date for significance decisions is September 01, 2018. This date does not necessarily coincide with the date of the actual decision on a bank’s significance.
The list is compiled on the basis of significance decisions adopted and notified by ECB that refer to events that became effective up to the cut-off date. If the authorization of a credit institution is withdrawn by ECB after the cut-off date, it will be marked by (#) in this list. While it is regularly reviewed whether an authorization of a listed bank is withdrawn, it should be noted that there might be a time gap between the withdrawal of the authorization and the time when the institution is marked with (#). Furthermore, it should be noted that other reasons for the ending of the authorization as credit institution than the withdrawal of the authorization will only be reflected in the list after the next cut-off date.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Supervised Entities, Significant Credit Institutions, Less Significant Credit Institutions, SSM, ECB
Previous ArticleEBA Updates XBRL Taxonomy 2.8 for Reporting
PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.
MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.
BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.
FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period.
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
ECB updated the guidance notes for reporting related to the statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups (SHSG).