SEC reopened comment period and/or requested additional comments on proposals related to various requirements for Security-Based Swap Dealers (SBSDs), Major Security-Based Swap Participants (MSBSPs), and broker-dealers. Comments should be submitted by November 19, 2018.
SEC is requesting additional comment on the proposed amendment that would establish an additional capital requirement for SBSDs that do not have a prudential regulator. In addition, SEC reopened the comment period and requested additional comment (including potential modifications to proposed rule language) on the proposed amendments and new rules that would:
- Establish capital, margin, and segregation requirements for SBSDs and MSBSPs that do not have a prudential regulator
- Raise minimum net capital requirements and establish liquidity requirements for broker-dealers that are permitted to use internal models when computing net capital (ANC broker-dealers)
- Establish the cross-border treatment of security-based swap capital, margin, and segregation requirements
Earlier, in October 2012, SEC had proposed amendments and new rules to establish capital and margin requirements for SBSDs and MSBSPs that do not have a prudential regulator, segregation requirements for SBSDs, and establish notification requirements for SBSDs and MSBSPs relating to segregation, in addition to raising the minimum net capital requirements and establishing liquidity requirements for broker-dealers permitted to use internal models when computing net capital. SEC has extended the comment period once, in addition to reopening it once. Moreover, in May 2013, SEC had proposed provisions to establish the cross-border treatment of security-based swap capital, margin, and segregation requirements. SEC received a number of comment letters in response to the 2012 and 2013 Proposals. Finally, in April 2014, SEC proposed an additional non-bank SBSD capital requirement. SEC received one comment letter in response to the 2014 proposal.
Since publication of the 2012 Proposals, SEC has adopted other rules related to the regulation of the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets pursuant to Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act. In addition, the prudential regulators and CFTC have adopted or proposed rules under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act that are relevant to the Proposals. SEC has carefully considered the comment letters and SEC believes it is prudent to reopen the comment period for the Proposals in light of these comments and regulatory developments. SEC believes the public should have the opportunity to provide comment on the potential economic effects of the Proposals in light of regulatory and market developments since they were published. SEC is also seeking comments on certain aspects of the Proposals for which further information would be particularly helpful to SEC. In particular, SEC is seeking comment on potential rule language that would modify rule text that was in the Proposals. Comment letters received by SEC previously need not be re-submitted, as they will continue to be a part of the public comment file for this rulemaking and considered by SEC.
Comment Due Date: November 19, 2018
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Security-based Swaps, Swap Dealers, Swap Participants, Cross-border Treatment, Capital Requirements, Dodd Frank Act, SEC
Previous ArticleBDF Updates A Supporting Document for AnaCredit Reporting
Next ArticleUS Agencies Publish Semi-Annual Regulatory Agenda
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).