US Agencies (FDIC, FED, NCUA, and OCC) are consulting on the policy statement on allowances for credit losses and on the guidance on credit risk review systems. The policy statement is intended to promote consistency in the interpretation and application of FASB credit losses accounting standard as codified in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 326. This accounting standard is covered in the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2016-13 and it introduces the current expected credit losses (CECL) methodology. The guidance discusses sound management of credit risk, a system of independent, ongoing credit review, and appropriate communication regarding the performance of the institution’s loan portfolio to its management and board of directors. The comments on each proposal will be accepted until December 16, 2019. The policy statement would become effective at the time of the adoption of the credit losses accounting standard.
The proposed interagency policy statement describes the measurement of expected credit losses using the CECL methodology and updates concepts and practices detailed in the existing supervisory guidance that remain applicable. The policy statement describes the CECL methodology for determining allowances for credit losses that are applicable to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loans held-for-investment, net investments in leases, held-to-maturity debt securities, and certain off-balance-sheet credit exposures, in accordance with the Topic 326. It also describes the estimation of an allowance for credit loss for an impaired available-for-sale debt security in accordance with the Subtopic 326-30. Additionally, the policy statement includes and updates concepts and practices detailed in the existing Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) policy statements that remain relevant under Topic 326. After the Topic 326 becomes effective for all institutions, the agencies will rescind the ALLL policy statements. CECL becomes effective for most public financial institutions beginning in 2020 and FASB recently decided to defer the effective date of CECL for all other institutions to 2023. The policy statement will not create any new or revise any existing collections of information. Therefore, no information collection request will be submitted to the OMB for review.
The proposed guidance on credit risk review systems is relevant to all institutions supervised by the agencies and aligns with the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness, which set out safety and soundness standards for insured depository institutions to establish a system for independent, ongoing credit risk review and including regular communication to its management and board of directors regarding the institution's loan portfolio performance. The guidance includes updates to reflect current industry credit review practices as well as terminology to align with the CECL methodology. The guidance outlines principles for use in developing and maintaining an effective credit risk review system. The extent to which the principles discussed in the proposed guidance are applicable depend on an institution's size, complexity, loan type, risk profile, and risk management practices. The proposed guidance also outlines characteristics of an effective credit risk rating framework, including the factors used to assign ratings to promote an effective risk review by qualified, independent parties. The proposed guidance will be issued as a stand-alone document and not as part of loan-loss reserve guidance, to highlight the important role of credit risk review systems in the overall risk management program of an institution.
- FED Press Release
- Notice on Policy Statement
- Notice on Credit Risk Review System
- FDIC Financial Institution Letter
Comment Due Date: December 16, 2019
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Accounting, Credit Risk, CECL, IFRS 9, Credit Losses Standard, Leases Standard, IFRS 16, Credit Ratings, US Agencies
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.