BCBS Issues Final Stress Testing Principles for Banks
BCBS issued the final, revised version of its stress testing principles for banks and supervisory and other relevant financial authorities in Basel Committee member jurisdictions. These principles have been finalized following a consultation in December 2017 and they replace the Principles for sound stress testing practices and supervision, which the Basel Committee had published in 2009.
The principles have been updated to reflect that stress testing is now both a critical element of risk management for banks and a core tool for banking supervisors and macro-prudential authorities. The updated principles are set at a high level so that they can be applied across banks and jurisdictions, remain relevant as stress testing practices evolve over time, and be used by jurisdictions to guide all elements of a sound stress testing framework. The principles are guidelines that cover the objectives, governance, policies, processes, methodology, resources, and documentation to guide stress testing activities and facilitate the use, implementation, and oversight of stress testing frameworks.
Each principle is followed by a short description of considerations that are equally relevant for banks and authorities. This description is followed by additional points applicable to either banks or authorities, as follows:
- Additional points for banks—points with relevance to (a) banks' own internal stress testing activities and (b) their participation in bank-run supervisory stress tests.
- Additional points for authorities—points with relevance to (a) supervisor-run stress tests and (b) the authorities' role in bank-run supervisory stress tests. They also cover the role of authorities in their oversight of internal stress testing activities of banks.
These principles have been formulated with a view toward application to large, internationally active banks and to supervisory and other relevant financial authorities in Basel Committee member jurisdictions; however, smaller banks and authorities in all jurisdictions can benefit from considering the potential impact of adverse scenarios on their business, even if they are not using a formal stress testing framework but are instead using simpler methods. These principles are, therefore, intended to be applied on a proportionate basis, depending on the size, complexity, and risk profile of the bank or banking sector for which an authority is responsible.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Stress Testing, Principles, Macro-prudential Framework, Systemic Risk, Proportionality, BCBS
Previous Article
FCA Publishes Feedback on Smarter Digital Regulatory ReportingRelated Insights
|
News
IAIS Publishes Drafts of Revised ICP 8, ICP 15, ICP 16, and ICP 20IAIS published the drafts of revised Insurance Core Principles on Public Disclosure (ICP 20), Investments (ICP 15), Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes (ICP 16), and Risk Management and Internal Controls (ICP 8), along with a revised draft of the glossary on enterprise risk management (ERM).
November 14, 2018
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
MAS Amends Notice 637 on Capital Adequacy Requirements in SingaporeMAS published the final, revised Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements in Singapore.
November 13, 2018
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ESMA Updates Q&A on Implementation of CSD Regulation and MARESMA updated questions and answers (Q&A) documents on the implementation of the Central Securities Depository (CSD) Regulation and Market Abuse Regulation (MAR).
November 12, 2018
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FSB Finalizes and Publishes the Cyber LexiconFSB published a cyber lexicon, following the public consultation earlier this year.
November 12, 2018
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
SRB Updates Liability Data Reporting Template for 2019SRB published version 2.7.1 of the Liability Data Reporting (LDR) Template.
November 12, 2018
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ECB to Conduct Comprehensive Assessment of Six Bulgarian BanksECB will undertake a comprehensive assessment of six Bulgarian banks. The exercise, comprising an asset quality review and a stress test, follows Bulgaria’s submission of a request to establish close cooperation with ECB on July 18, 2018.
November 12, 2018
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
IMF Publishes Reports on the 2018 Article IV Consultation with ChileIMF published its staff report and selected issues report under the 2018 Article IV consultation with Chile.
November 09, 2018
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
PRA Issues PS27/18 on Implementing the Extension of SM&CR to InsurersPRA published the policy statement PS27/18, which provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP20/18, on implementing the extension of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) to insurers (Part 2).
November 09, 2018
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for November 2018EBA published answers to seven questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.
November 09, 2018
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED Finalizes the Large Financial Institution Rating SystemFED finalized the new supervisory rating system for Large Financial Institutions (LFIs), to better align with the current supervisory programs and practices for these firms.
November 09, 2018
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
