BCBS Issues Final Stress Testing Principles for Banks
BCBS issued the final, revised version of its stress testing principles for banks and supervisory and other relevant financial authorities in Basel Committee member jurisdictions. These principles have been finalized following a consultation in December 2017 and they replace the Principles for sound stress testing practices and supervision, which the Basel Committee had published in 2009.
The principles have been updated to reflect that stress testing is now both a critical element of risk management for banks and a core tool for banking supervisors and macro-prudential authorities. The updated principles are set at a high level so that they can be applied across banks and jurisdictions, remain relevant as stress testing practices evolve over time, and be used by jurisdictions to guide all elements of a sound stress testing framework. The principles are guidelines that cover the objectives, governance, policies, processes, methodology, resources, and documentation to guide stress testing activities and facilitate the use, implementation, and oversight of stress testing frameworks.
Each principle is followed by a short description of considerations that are equally relevant for banks and authorities. This description is followed by additional points applicable to either banks or authorities, as follows:
- Additional points for banks—points with relevance to (a) banks' own internal stress testing activities and (b) their participation in bank-run supervisory stress tests.
- Additional points for authorities—points with relevance to (a) supervisor-run stress tests and (b) the authorities' role in bank-run supervisory stress tests. They also cover the role of authorities in their oversight of internal stress testing activities of banks.
These principles have been formulated with a view toward application to large, internationally active banks and to supervisory and other relevant financial authorities in Basel Committee member jurisdictions; however, smaller banks and authorities in all jurisdictions can benefit from considering the potential impact of adverse scenarios on their business, even if they are not using a formal stress testing framework but are instead using simpler methods. These principles are, therefore, intended to be applied on a proportionate basis, depending on the size, complexity, and risk profile of the bank or banking sector for which an authority is responsible.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Stress Testing, Principles, Macro-prudential Framework, Systemic Risk, Proportionality, BCBS
Previous Article
FCA Publishes Feedback on Smarter Digital Regulatory ReportingRelated Articles
|
News
US Agencies Consult on Capital Treatment of Land Development LoansUS Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) issued a proposed rule on the treatment of loans that finance the development of land for purposes of the one- to four-family residential properties exclusion in the definition of high volatility commercial real estate (HVCRE) exposure in the regulatory capital rule.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for July 2019Under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week, EBA published answers to five questions related to supervisory reporting.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ESMA Updates Manual for European Single Electronic Format in EUESMA updated the reporting manual for European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED Updates Supplemental Instructions for Reporting Form FR Y-9CFED updated the supplemental instructions for FR Y-9C reporting.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Publishes Report on Monitoring Implementation of LCR in EUEBA published its first report on the monitoring of the implementation of liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) in EU.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
APRA Applies Additional Capital Requirements to Three Australian BanksAPRA is applying additional capital requirements to three major banks in Australia to reflect higher operational risk identified in their risk governance self-assessments.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
IMF Report on 2019 Article IV Consultation on Euro Area PoliciesIMF published its staff report in context of the 2019 Article IV consultation on euro area policies with member countries.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FSB to Survey Practices on Cyber Incident Response and RecoveryFSB launched a survey on the industry practices on cyber incident response and recovery.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ECB Appoints New Members of Supervisory BoardThe Governing Council of ECB appointed Edouard Fernandez-Bollo, Kerstin af Jochnick, and Elizabeth McCaul as representatives to the Supervisory Board of ECB Banking Supervision, for a five-year non-renewable term.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
OSFI Consults on Applying Proportionality to Pillar 1 Rules in CanadaOSFI published a discussion paper seeks input on possible tailoring of the capital and liquidity requirements for small and medium-size deposit-taking institutions.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
