HKMA issued guidance on management accountability, at Registered Institutions, for conducting or supervising the conduct of businesses that constitute regulated activities. The guidance is set out in the form of a list of frequently asked questions.
Under the guidance, relevant information on individual chief executives, alternate chief executives, directors, and section 72B managers principally responsible for the regulated activities business should be submitted to the HKMA and the SFC. In addition, an organization chart depicting the Registered Institution’s management and governance structure relevant to its regulated activities business should be provided. To allow sufficient time for preparatory work, Registered Institutions are provided with six months for preparation and are expected to submit the required information by April 16, 2018. For applications of registration as a Registered Institution or addition of regulated activities, applicants should also submit the required information to the HKMA in support of their applications, starting from the same date.
This guidance should be read in conjunction with Supervisory Policy Manual (SPM) module SB-1 “Supervision of regulated activities of SFC-registered authorized institutions,” along with SPM modules CG-1 “Corporate governance of locally-incorporated authorized institutions” and CG-2 “Systems of control for the appointment of managers.”
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Business Conduct, Management Accountability, Guidance, Corporate Governance, HKMA
Previous ArticleEC Publishes US-EU Bilateral Agreement and Related Council Decisions
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.