EC published the first annual report of the International Platform on Sustainable Finance (IPSF). The report provides an overview of the work done over the previous year and outlines the crucial role of sustainable finance in the context of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The IPSF work is focused on developing Common Ground Taxonomy, developing standards and labels for sustainable finance products, and improving climate-related disclosure. The report highlights that significant gaps still exist in the quality and comparability of environmental-related information disclosed by companies. Thus, most IPSF members with regulatory regimes are revising them while those with voluntary-based approaches are considering a shift to hard law.
The report presents an overview of the main characteristics of member jurisdictions' sustainable finance tools in three key focus areas of IPSF: taxonomies, standards and labels, and disclosures. It underlines the main commonalities and divergences in IPSF jurisdictions. Sustainable finance markets have grown massively in volume and in diversity during the last years, but their growth is still far from sufficient to achieve the targets. The report notes that the policy tools on which the IPSF work focuses have the capacity to be very efficient to further scale up sustainable finance:
- The development of green taxonomies within the IPSF membership is nascent, but uptake potential is promising. Many IPSF jurisdictions are considering developing a taxonomy and the potential for comparability in this area is significant. IPSF initiated a working group on taxonomies that will work toward a “Common Ground Taxonomy,” highlighting the commonalities between existing taxonomies. This Common Ground Taxonomy will enhance transparency about what is commonly green in member jurisdictions and contribute to scale up cross-border green investments significantly.
- More and more jurisdictions are developing standards and labels for sustainable financial products, with regulations and guidelines, to provide transparency and clarity and address the risk of greenwashing. IPSF will keep monitoring market developments regarding standards and labels and could envisage the creation of a dedicated working group in the near future.
- In recent years, environmental-related disclosure has improved considerably and a majority of IPSF members have already set mandatory regulatory requirements. Nonetheless, there are still significant gaps notably in the quality and comparability of information disclosed to meet the needs of investors. In this light, most IPSF members with regulatory regimes are revising them while those with voluntary-based approaches are considering a shift to hard law. To ensure that these developments are coordinated and coherent, IPSF is about to launch a working group on corporate environmental-related disclosure. This working group will facilitate the exchange of views and information on national and international policy and regulatory developments regarding environmental-related reporting and will support further alignment of disclosure requirements across IPSF member jurisdictions.
The analysis of this report constitutes the basis for further in-depth work within the IPSF to facilitate comparability and convergence in approaches, in particular the creation of two working groups on taxonomies and disclosure and possibly, in the future on standards and labels. While green financial markets are growing, more work needs to be done to meet environmental objectives, especially to facilitate green recovery following the pandemic. To this end, IPSF created a working group on taxonomies, co-led by the EU and China, to help enhance transparency for investors and facilitate cross-border green investments. The report points out that continued efforts will ensure that jurisdictions continue to develop regulatory tools to better harness the resources of the financial system in the transition to a sustainable future.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Annual Report, COVID-19, Disclosures, Reporting, Taxonomy, IPSF, EC
Previous ArticleCSSF Publishes Guidance on COREP and FINREP Reporting
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.