EIOPA is consulting on an opinion that sets out technical advice for the 2020 review of Solvency II. The opinion, once finalized, will respond to the call for advice of EC on the 2020 Solvency II review. The key topics covered in the consultation include long-term guarantee measures, measures on equity risk, technical provisions, own funds, standard formula for solvency capital requirement, calculation of minimum capital requirement, reporting and disclosures, proportionality, group supervision, macro-prudential policy, and recovery and resolution. The comment period on this consultation ends on January 15, 2020 and EIOPA plans to issue the final advice in June 2020.
The EC call for advice comprised 19 topics that can be broadly categorized into three areas. The first topic is on the review of the long-term guarantee measures, with a number of different options being consulted on, notably on extrapolation and on the volatility adjustment. The second topic addresses the potential introduction of new regulatory tools in the Solvency II Directive, notably on macro-prudential tools, recovery and resolution, and insurance guarantee schemes. These new regulatory tools are considered thoroughly in the consultation. The third and final topic involves revisions to the existing Solvency II framework, including in relation to freedom of services and establishment, reporting and disclosure, and the solvency capital requirement. This consultation covers all areas of the call for advice, except the insurance guarantee schemes and the topics on reporting and disclosure that have been already consulted on.
Overall, EIOPA opines that the Solvency II framework is working well. Therefore the approach in the consultation paper is of evolution rather than revolution. The key considerations and proposals of this consultation are as follows:
- Considerations to choose a later starting point for the extrapolation of risk-free interest rates for the euro or to change the extrapolation method to take into account market information beyond the starting point.
- Considerations to change the calculation of the volatility adjustment to risk-free interest rates, in particular to address overshooting effects and to reflect the illiquidity of insurance liabilities. The advice includes proposals to strengthen the public disclosure on the long term guarantees measures and the risk management provisions
- The proposal to increase the calibration of the interest rate risk sub-module in line with empirical evidence, in particular the existence of negative interest rates. The proposal is consistent with the technical advice EIOPA provided on the Solvency Capital Requirement standard formula in 2018.
- The proposal to include macro-prudential tools in the Solvency II Directive. EIOPA proposes a comprehensive framework, covering the tools initially considered by EC as well as other tools that EIOPA considers necessary to equip national supervisory authorities with sufficient powers to address the sources of systemic risk in insurance. The tools initially considered by EC include improvements in Own Risk and Solvency Assessment, the prudent person principle, and the drafting of systemic risk and liquidity risk management plans.
- The proposal to establish a minimum harmonized and comprehensive recovery and resolution framework for insurance. In the advice, EIOPA focuses on the recovery measures including the request for pre-emptive recovery planning and early intervention measures. Subsequently, the advice covers all relevant aspects around the resolution process, such as the designation of a resolution authority, the resolution objectives, and the need for resolution planning and for a wide range of resolution powers to be exercised in a proportionate way. The last part of the advice is devoted to the triggers for early intervention and entry into recovery and into resolution.
EIOPA also published a qualitative impact assessment of the combined impact of all proposed changes. For technical options on certain topics, it also includes a quantitative assessment of costs. The qualitative analysis will be supplemented with the analysis of the data gathered though the information request to national supervisory authorities and insurance and reinsurance undertakings in parallel to the public consultation. Furthermore, in 2020, EIOPA will collect data to assess the quantitative combined impact of the proposals to be included in the advice.
Comment Due Date: January 15, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Solvency II Review, Recovery and Resolution, Macro-Prudential Tools, SCR, Own Funds, Reporting, Proportionality, EIOPA
Previous ArticleDNB Proposes Lower Limit on Risk-Weighting of Mortgage Loans
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) proposed to amend the supervisory statement on supervision of run-off undertakings that are subject to Solvency II regulation.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.