The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a thematic note that aims to identify and raise awareness of the transition risks of benchmark rates, as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the Euro Overnight Index Average (EONIA) are close to being phased out. The note identifies pockets of transition risks for banks in the European Economic Area (EEA), resulting from their significant exposures linked to LIBOR and EONIA rates. The note highlights that banks and competent authorities consider that legal challenges associated with the transition of existing business of the assets side as well as the required changes in internal operations and systems of banks remain key areas of concern.
Banks in European Union (EU) have reported significant derivatives and loan exposures linked to various LIBOR currencies and tenors as well as EONIA rates that will cease at the end of the year. A very high percentage (more than 25%) of EU/EEA banks’ derivatives exposure is linked to LIBOR, reaching nearly EUR 50 trillion (notional amount). In addition, about EUR 1 trillion of loans and advances are linked to various tenors of LIBOR and EUR 0.2 trillion of loans and advances are linked to EONIA rates. CHF LIBOR referenced loans are a particular focal point in this analysis as political risks add to the existing legal transition risks for these loans. Transition of important benchmark rates bear elevated risks, as these rates play a major role in banks’ daily business, including in valuation and risk management. Thus, acknowledging and addressing the underlying risks should be a key priority for market participants.
The note shows that banks still hold major volumes of assets, liabilities, and derivatives related to ceasing benchmark rates. Banks need to address the changes to affected contracts, which so far do not include, for instance, any fallback language, and need to check their robust written plans setting out the actions they would take in the event that a benchmark ceases or materially changes. Keeping clients and other counterparties informed about the upcoming changes is also part of this work. It is important that all parties involved in the transition process cooperate, including banks, their clients, and other counterparties as well as regulators and supervisors. Banks, like any other market participants, should adhere to guidance given by regulators and other authorities involved in the transition of benchmark rates. If benchmark rate transitions affect, for instance, banks’ internal models or prudent valuations an early exchange with their supervisors is important. Addressing potential legal or conduct-related risks related to the transitions also remains important for banks, along with the risks associated with transitioning the information and communications technology (ICT) systems. Thus, it is key that transitions of benchmark rates are managed diligently and timely within the remaining months.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, LIBOR, EONIA, Risk Free Rates, Benchmark Reforms, Benchmark Fallbacks, Derivatives, Basel, EBA
Previous ArticleBCBS Report Examines Progress on Adoption of Basel III Framework
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.