The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the adjustments to stress tests in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The note discusses how three authorities in UK, EU, and US (BoE, ECB, and FED, respectively) have adjusted the regular stress testing exercises to provide an initial assessment of the impact of the pandemic on the banking sector. The brief concludes with reflections about the relevance of stress tests during the pandemic and the possible expansion of the use of stress testing from a first-response tool to a more a precise instrument that can be applied to individual banks.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, three authorities (BoE, ECB, and FED) that regularly conduct stress tests on individual banks adjusted their approach. They performed ad hoc exercises to assess the vulnerability of banking sectors in their jurisdictions. The ad hoc exercises were conducted mid-year, following a rapid deterioration in economic conditions that had emerged by the end of the first quarter of 2020. These exercises were different from the regular stress tests in terms of key features such as objectives, design, methodologies, and communication. However, some of the features of the regular stress tests did not change. The brief includes a table that summarizes the approach taken by the authorities that decided to conduct a first round of these ad hoc exercises. In all cases, the exercises comprised only the top-down component and banks were not involved. Also, the COVID-19-related policy response was incorporated into the three ad hoc stress tests in different ways.
The analysis concluded that stress tests, being forward-looking assessments of bank resilience, represent a useful instrument in the toolkit of authorities to assess condition of banks even under unusual circumstances such as the ones created by the COVID-19 pandemic. The experience of the three exercises discussed in the brief showed, however, the difficulties of adjusting a complex exercise such as an annual stress test to a very different set of conditions. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, stress tests can, in the first instance, help gauge the system-wide impact of the pandemic on the banking sector. This can help authorities in comparing the economic impact of the pandemic against the capacity of the banking sector to continue supporting the real economy by providing credit to it. However, over time, it may be important to have a more granular view of the impact of pandemic on individual banks. This in turn will help guide any possible supervisory or resolution action. For this to happen, the initial adjustments in the stress testing frameworks that were introduced in first response to the pandemic would benefit from further refinement. Importantly, stress tests under COVID-19 can be most effective when authorities explain the objectives of these exercises and ensure that they are well-aligned with the way the results will be employed and shared with the banks and the public.
Keywords: International, Americas, Europe, EU, UK, Banking, COVID-19, Stress testing, Basel, BoE, ECB, FSI, BIS
Previous ArticleEIOPA Finalizes Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.