PBC launched a consultation on the rules for verification of standard debt-based assets. The proposed rules clarify and list the standard and non-standard debt-based assets, in addition to providing the verification criteria and the related regulatory arrangements. To standardize financial institutions’ investment in asset management products, strengthen investor protection, promote sound development of direct financing, and prevent financial risks effectively, the draft rules have been formulated in accordance with the Guidelines of PBC, CBIRC, CSRC, and State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Regulating Asset Management by Financial Institutions. The deadline for comments is November 10, 2019. The rules shall take effect on the day of their official release. PBC also released questions and answers (Q&As) related to the draft rules.
Under the rules, standard debt-based assets refer to bonds, asset-backed securities, and other fixed-income securities, which are issued according to the relevant regulations. Other fixed-income securities include treasury bonds, central bank bills, local government bonds, financial bonds, debt-financing instruments for non-financial enterprises, bonds issued by international institutions, interbank certificates of deposit, credit asset-backed securities, asset-backed bills, and asset-backed securities listed for trading on stock exchanges. The rules further specify that to be recognized as standard debt-based assets, other debt-based assets are required to meet requirements related to the following:
- Equal division and tradability
- Information disclosure
- Centralized registration and independent custody
- Fair-value pricing and sound liquidity mechanism
- Trading of assets on markets approved by the State Council
Comment Due Date: November 10, 2019
Keywords: Asia Pacific, China, Banking, Securities, Asset-backed Securities, Debt-based Securities, Asset Management, PBC
Previous ArticlePRA Consults on Treatment of Restricted Tier 1 Own Funds Instruments
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
PRA published updates in relation to the 2021 Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolio exercise.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
HKMA revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.