The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) made available an interim report that delves deeper into the challenges related to the assessment of links between biodiversity loss and the macroeconomic and financial systems. The report provides potential ways forward for central banks and financial supervisors to incorporate the derived insights in the exercise of their tasks. The report has been published by the joint Study Group on Biodiversity and Financial Stability, which the NGFS and the International Network for Sustainable Financial Policy Insights, Research, and Exchange (INSPIRE) had launched in April 2021. Following this interim report, the Study Group expects to publish a final report early 2022.
This report is the second output of the Joint NGFS-INSPIRE Study Group on Biodiversity and Financial Stability. The group comprises 30 NGFS members and observers, along with the 30 INSPIRE researchers from academia, civil society groups, and think-tanks. The report finds that there is growing evidence that biodiversity loss could have significant economic and financial implications, since the decline of ecosystem services poses physical risks for the economic actors that depend on them. This could also involve transition risks from policies designed to halt biodiversity loss, such as the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, expected to be agreed at COP 15 conference in Kunming, China, next spring. This potential to contribute to the financial instability means that central banks and financial supervisors could start to better assess the risks associated with the loss of biodiversity. The authors recommend that, to address this issue, central banks and financial supervisors can:
- Begin building the skills, capacities, tools, and cooperation to address biodiversity-related economic and financial risks
- Assess the dependencies and impact of their financial institutions on ecosystem services and biodiversity and become more familiar with the existing biodiversity-economy models; they could draw on scenario analysis or new systematic measures of financial institution dependencies and impacts as well as develop ad hoc methodological approaches to better capture the risk of impact cascading through economic and financial systems
- Signal, to the financial institutions that they supervise, other economic actors, and policymakers, the importance of understanding the risks arising from their dependencies and impact on biodiversity
- Support governments’ efforts (within their remit) to reverse biodiversity loss, in particular regarding the implementation of the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework by addressing financial risks and preparing the financial infrastructure required for nature-positive financing
In addition to these recommendations, the report offers the first overview of emerging central bank activity in relation to the biodiversity issues and the consideration of the role the financial system might play in the proposed post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. This interim report sets the stage for a final report from the Study Group, which is due to be published in early 2022. That report will explore in further detail the linkages among the biodiversity loss, the macroeconomy, and the financial system, drawing on existing research and leading practices. The final report will more comprehensively consider options for central banks and financial supervisors to address the micro- and macro-prudential risks that biodiversity loss poses as well as set out a research agenda.
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Insurance, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Financial Stability, Biodiversity Loss, Physical Risks, Transition Risks, Scenario Analysis, Stress Testing, NGFS
Previous ArticleCFPB Proposes Rule on Small Business Lending Data Collection
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying and, where relevant, calibrating the minimum performance-related triggers for simple.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is undertaking the integrated reporting framework (IReF) project to integrate statistical requirements for banks into a standardized reporting framework that would be applicable across the euro area and adopted by authorities in other EU member states.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been awarded the top European Standard for its environmental performance under the European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) set out the Financial Services Industry Transformation Map 2025 and, in collaboration with the SGX Group, launched ESGenome.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision met, shortly after a gathering of the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS), the oversight body of BCBS.
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) welcomed the work of the international audit and assurance standard setters—the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)
The Bank of England (BoE) published a Statistical Notice (2022/18), which informs that due to the Bank Holiday granted for Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II’s State Funeral on Monday September 19, 2022.
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) announced that the European Banking Authority (EBA) has updated its filing rules and the implementation dates for certain modules of the EBA reporting framework 3.2.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper that examines how credit rating agencies accepted by the Eurosystem, as part of the Eurosystem Credit Assessment Framework (ECAF)
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced reduction in the aggregate Committed Liquidity Facility (CLF) for authorized deposit-taking entities to ~USD 33 billion on September 01, 2022.