EIOPA on Supervisory Approach to Product Oversight and Governance
EIOPA published its approach to the supervision of product oversight and governance requirements in the insurance sector in EU. EIOPA takes a consumer-centric approach to supervision based on the requirements of the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD). This approach is expected to support insurance manufacturers and distributors when implementing their own product oversight and governance policies as well as to facilitate engagement with national supervisors.
In the published guidance document, EIOPA explains the approach and aim to supervision of product oversight and governance in the insurance sector. EIOPA emphasizes that insurance manufacturers and distributors should take into account their business model, product complexity, and characteristics of the target market in their policies and processes. It also sets out the approach by explaining that supervisors will focus on how insurers and distributors ensure customer-centric business product design, approval, and distribution process with adequate systems and controls in place by:
- Establishing whether target markets for each product are adequately defined
- Assessing whether product testing sufficiently assesses the fairness and the value of each product
- Determining whether distribution strategies are adequate
- Assessing whether manufacturers adequately monitor and regularly review products, either for ad hoc reviews or at appropriate intervals
The published document is for information purposes only and is neither binding on national competent authorities, nor on insurance distributors and insurance manufacturers. It does not amend or form any part of the IDD or the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2358 (POG-DR). As explained, supervision of product oversight and governance is based on Article 25 of IDD. The requirements outlined in Article 25 are further specified in the POG-DR. Articles 2 and 3 of the POG-DR specify that product oversight and governance requirements are applicable to insurance undertakings (subject to Solvency II and to IDD) and to insurance intermediaries (subject to IDD) which manufacture insurance products that are offered for sale to customers and which advise on or propose insurance products that they do not manufacture.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Product Oversight and Governance, Insurance Distribution Directive, Proportionality, IDD, Solvency II, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Adam Koursaris
Asset and liability management expert; capable modeler; risk and capital specialist
Cassandra Hannibal
Life insurance actuary; risk management and economic capital specialist
Jerome Ogrodzki
Insurance asset and liabilities modeling specialist; stochastic modeling expert
Previous Article
SNB Updates Reporting Forms for Liquidity Monitoring ToolsNext Article
FED Proposes to Revise and Extend FR Y-9 ReportsRelated Articles
APRA Sets LAC for D-SIBs, Proposes to Enhance Crisis Preparedness
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
EC to Review Macro-Prudential Rules while ESRB Assesses Policy Stance
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
FSB Sets Out Good Practices for Crisis Management Groups
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
OSFI Updates Timeline for Implementation of Certain Basel Rules
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EC Defers Adoption of Regulatory Standards for Disclosures Under SFDR
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
FCA Releases MIFIDPRU Application Forms and Third Set of Rules on IFPR
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
