PRA issued a letter to credit unions notifying them of its decision to publish a model direction modifying a PRA rule on minimum provisioning requirements. The letter includes the detailed PRA rule modification available to all consenting credit unions from January 02, 2021 until December 31, 2022. PRA has taken this decision due to the ongoing stress credit unions face due to the COVID-19 outbreak and the importance of a credit union’s capacity to cure bad debts prior to 12 months. The letter reiterates the messages on engagement with PRA and regulatory reporting, also confirming the supervisory focus and priorities for credit unions in this period.
The modification of PRA rule on minimum provisioning requirements is identical in effect to a modification available to all credit unions, which expires on January 01, 2021. Where credit unions consent to the modification, minimum provisioning requirements for bad debt will be reduced to the rates set out below:
- 20% of the net liability to the credit union of borrowers where the amount is more than three months in arrears
- 40% of the net liability to the credit union of borrowers where the amount is more than six months in arrears
- 60% of the net liability to the credit union of borrowers where the amount is more than nine months in arrears
- 100% of the net liability to the credit union of borrowers where the amount is more than twelve months in arrears
Credit unions that have consented to the current modification must also consent to the new modification if they wish the modified rules to continue to apply to them after January 01, 2021. Credit unions can consent in advance of January 02, 2021, although the modification will not apply until that date. If taking up the modification, credit unions should be mindful of the overarching PRA requirement on provisioning and provision accordingly and appropriately. In the letter, PRA mentioned that some credit unions have changed their strategic approach to new lending and credit control amid crisis. If credit unions do make such changes, it is essential that Boards consider and accept the associated risks and the potential financial impact in the short, medium, and long term, in addition to ensuring they have focused management information that allows them to measure the success of their approach.
In the letter, PRA also emphasized on the importance of a credit union’s cure rate as an indicator. The nature of PRA provisioning requirements, whether or not a credit union consents to the modification of PRA provisioning rules, means a credit union’s capacity to cure bad debts—particularly before they reach 12 months in arrears—is a key driver in terms of financial performance. The analysis of PRA shows that credit unions that engage with members whose loans are in arrears and get them paying again before the mandatory 100% provision hits at 12 months have a much better chance of avoiding financial difficulty.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, COVID-19, Minimum Provisioning Requirement, Reporting, Credit Risk, PRA Rulebook, Credit Unions
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleFSB and IMF Set Out Progress on Phase Two of Data Gaps Initiative
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.