When asked in the Parliament about the plans to make green financing more accessible to small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs), Tharman Shanmugaratnam of MAS emphasized that MAS is taking further steps to promote green and sustainability-linked loans to SMEs. Later this year, MAS will launch a Green and Sustainability-Linked Loan Grant Scheme, which will be open to SMEs and other corporates. This grant will defray the cost of obtaining independent external reviews to demonstrate that sustainability targets are material and to verify that the loan proceeds will be channeled to green and sustainable activities.
According to Mr. Shanmugaratnam, another possible solution for promoting green and sustainability-linked loans is to develop lending frameworks that provide simplified processes and set out clear standardized criteria for borrowers. With such lending frameworks, there would be no need to engage external reviewers to develop, verify, and maintain customized green finance frameworks for each borrower. HSBC’s Green Loan Framework for SMEs, which was launched in Singapore in March 2020, is a promising start and MAS will encourage more lenders to develop such frameworks. As green and sustainable finance activities grow in Singapore, the anchoring of relevant capabilities here will help to bring such loans into the mainstream while encouraging more SMEs to adopt green and sustainability financing. Green and sustainable financing flows are growing strongly in Singapore. From 2019 till the first half of this year, approximately SGD 4.8 billion of green and sustainability bonds were issued in Singapore. However, the green share of total loan and bond transactions in Singapore remains modest at less than 5%, reflecting the significant opportunity for growth.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Securities, Green Finance, Sustainable Finance, ESG, SME, MAS
Previous ArticleMAS Announces Extension of Support Measures Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is consulting on the draft Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628), or FIRO, Code of Practice chapter on liquidity and funding in resolution, until March 14, 2022.
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) announced that the capital adequacy reporting as at December 31, 2021 must be done by February 11, 2022.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) announced that the guidelines on the reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures COVID-relief measures shall continue to apply until further notice.
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).