BoE published a working paper on predicting bank distress in the UK using machine learning techniques. In the analysis, the main input variables come from confidential regulatory returns while the measure of distress is derived from supervisory assessments of bank riskiness from 2006 through to 2012. Overall, the paper demonstrates practical benefits of machine learning and ensembling methods for providing regulators with advance warning of firm distress. Supervisors can apply these findings to aid in anticipating problems before they occur, thus helping them in their mission to keep financial institutions safe and sound.
The authors compare a number of machine learning and classical statistical techniques, implementing a rigorous, double-block randomized cross-validation procedure to evaluate out-of-sample performance. The random forest algorithm was found to be superior in terms of ranking test observations, while also having relatively better calibrated probabilities than the other techniques. The performance results indicate that the random forest should be used to build an early warning system. To improve the transparency of the algorithm, the study examined the drivers of the predicted probabilities of the model, utilizing an aggregation of Shapley values per test set observation and Shapley regression framework. The Shapley regression reveals the importance of macroeconomic variables and a firm’s sensitivity to market risk, capital buffer, and net interest margin. Finally, the authors also performed simple ensembling techniques to combine all the model outputs, demonstrating substantive and statistically significant improvements relative to the random forest on its own.
Future research might extend this analysis in a number of ways. First, scholars might seek to incorporate additional data beyond financial ratios and macroeconomic variables. Second, future work might delve into more complex configurations of diverse underlying models to reap substantive improvements. Third, the analysis relies on data from a highly unusual period in economic history. Future research might seek to establish whether the documented relationship between input variables and measures of distress persist in relatively benign economic environments. It is likely that in such periods macroeconomic variables are less important in predicting firm distress and, therefore, an early warning system might be better if it were based on data that encompasses more or all of an economic cycle.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Machine Learning, Statistical Techniques, Ensembling Techniques, Research, Technology, Bank Distress, BoE
Previous ArticleBDE Updates Technical Instructions for Reporting by Banks
Next ArticleSRB Publishes Annual Report for 2018
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.