ISDA published a statement emphasizing the importance of derivatives market in the transition to a sustainable economy. ISDA has convened the Sustainable Finance Working Group to discuss how ISDA can ensure better alignment with cash products and identify areas where the development of standard terms and definitions for environment, social, and governance (ESG) derivatives may be necessary. In the statement, ISDA espouses that, along with the development of ESG derivatives products, work will be needed to promote standardization across jurisdictions and market segments.
ISDA has always been a strong proponent of standardization in documentation, market practices, operational processes, and wherever else it might make economic sense. This is just as important in a relatively new area like ESG as it is in more established markets. ISDA documentation and definitions are already being used to document ESG transactions. For example, swaps that are linked to a client’s performance against a set of sustainability targets have been documented under the 2006 ISDA Definitions. ISDA has also started to expand the range of ISDA templates for environmental trading to include renewable energy certificates. If needed in the future, ISDA will amend the existing ISDA templates for transactions with particular relevance to ESG and sustainable finance, such as emissions allowances, weather, and other commodities. Recently, ISDA also hosted a virtual conference on ESG and derivatives. In addition, ISDA had cooperated with the Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS) on a report, which was published in July 2020, on the role of derivatives in sustainable finance. Among other issues, the report discussed how supervisors are calling for an alignment of the prudential treatment of greens assets with the current credit risk framework.
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Derivatives, ESG, Sustainable Finance, Climate Change Risk, ISDA
Previous ArticleEBA Issues Guidelines on Sectoral Exposures for Systemic Risk Buffer
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/763 that lays down implementing technical standards for supervisory reporting and public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
EBA published a report that examines the convergence of prudential supervisory practices in 2020 and offers conclusions of the EBA college monitoring activity.
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
The private sector working group of ECB on euro risk-free rates published the recommendations to address events that would trigger fallbacks in the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)-related contracts, along with the €STR-based EURIBOR fallback rates (rates that could be used if a fallback is triggered).
Bundesbank published a list of "EntryPoints" that are accepted in its reporting system; the list provides taxonomy version and name of the module against each EntryPoint.
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
The Sustainable Finance Taskforce of IOSCO held two roundtables, with global stakeholders, on the IOSCO priorities to enhance the reliability, comparability, and consistency of sustainability-related disclosures and to collect views on the practical implementation of a global system architecture for these disclosures.
Asia Pacific Australia Banking APS 111 Capital Adequacy Regulatory Capital Basel RBNZ APRA
ESMA published the final guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers.
EBA published annual data for two key concepts and indicators in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) Directive—available financial means and covered deposits.