ISDA published a statement emphasizing the importance of derivatives market in the transition to a sustainable economy. ISDA has convened the Sustainable Finance Working Group to discuss how ISDA can ensure better alignment with cash products and identify areas where the development of standard terms and definitions for environment, social, and governance (ESG) derivatives may be necessary. In the statement, ISDA espouses that, along with the development of ESG derivatives products, work will be needed to promote standardization across jurisdictions and market segments.
ISDA has always been a strong proponent of standardization in documentation, market practices, operational processes, and wherever else it might make economic sense. This is just as important in a relatively new area like ESG as it is in more established markets. ISDA documentation and definitions are already being used to document ESG transactions. For example, swaps that are linked to a client’s performance against a set of sustainability targets have been documented under the 2006 ISDA Definitions. ISDA has also started to expand the range of ISDA templates for environmental trading to include renewable energy certificates. If needed in the future, ISDA will amend the existing ISDA templates for transactions with particular relevance to ESG and sustainable finance, such as emissions allowances, weather, and other commodities. Recently, ISDA also hosted a virtual conference on ESG and derivatives. In addition, ISDA had cooperated with the Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS) on a report, which was published in July 2020, on the role of derivatives in sustainable finance. Among other issues, the report discussed how supervisors are calling for an alignment of the prudential treatment of greens assets with the current credit risk framework.
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Derivatives, ESG, Sustainable Finance, Climate Change Risk, ISDA
Previous ArticleEBA Issues Guidelines on Sectoral Exposures for Systemic Risk Buffer
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The EBA Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to ten questions.
ESMA updated the set of questions and answers (Q&A), along with the reporting instructions and an XML schema for the templates set out in the technical standards on disclosure requirements, under the Securitization Regulation.
EU published Regulation 2021/337, which amends the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EC), regarding the use of the single electronic reporting format for annual financial reports.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.