ESMA published a response to the targeted consultation of EC on the establishment of the green bond standard, or GBS, in EU. ESMA welcomes the EC consultation, which builds on the European Green Deal and supports the EC ambition to strengthen the European policy framework to enhance the resilience of the financial sector to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks. ESMA highlights that success of the green bond standard will be determined by whether it is seen as a reliable indicator of investment in sustainable economic activities. A higher level of adherence to the standard will result in improved comparability as well as deeper, and possibly more liquid, secondary markets for these types of issuances. This will, in turn, permit investors to make better informed investment decisions and encourage further issuances of green bonds.
Building on its response to the EC consultation on the Renewed Sustainable Finance Strategy in July 2020, where specific points in relation to the green bond standard framework were raised, ESMA highlights the following key messages:
- The success of the green bond standard in EU will, to a large extent, be determined by whether it is seen as a reliable indicator of investment in sustainable economic activities. To ensure reliability and alignment with the Taxonomy, the green bond standard will require external reviewers conducting rigorous assessments of the green bond framework of an issuer.
- The best way to ensure high-quality assessments is to introduce a formal EU registration and supervision regime of these external reviewers. This will ensure that the entities conducting such assessments have adequate resources, are using robust methodologies, and have measures in place to protect against conflicts of interest.
- It is important to ensure that the final regime will not result in market concentration of external reviewers, which may disadvantage issuers, especially SMEs, as well as smaller external reviewers, while still ensuring that the market develops in a properly regulated and supervised way at EU level.
- It supports the development of a social EU Taxonomy as a prerequisite for reliable standards for social bonds.
ESMA concludes its response by reiterating its support for the work of EC, as EC finalizes the proposals, and reinforces its readiness to provide further views on the future green bond standard framework, as needed.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Green Bond Standard, ESG, Climate Change Risk, Sustainable Finance Strategy, Green Taxonomy, EC, ESMA
Previous ArticleESMA Publishes Work Program for 2021
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.
EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.
ECB published a letter from Andrea Enria, the Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB, answering questions raised by the President of the Bundestag (the German federal parliament) on how ECB assesses the financial stability of the euro area in the context of the significant level of nonperforming loans.