ESMA published a response to the targeted consultation of EC on the establishment of the green bond standard, or GBS, in EU. ESMA welcomes the EC consultation, which builds on the European Green Deal and supports the EC ambition to strengthen the European policy framework to enhance the resilience of the financial sector to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks. ESMA highlights that success of the green bond standard will be determined by whether it is seen as a reliable indicator of investment in sustainable economic activities. A higher level of adherence to the standard will result in improved comparability as well as deeper, and possibly more liquid, secondary markets for these types of issuances. This will, in turn, permit investors to make better informed investment decisions and encourage further issuances of green bonds.
Building on its response to the EC consultation on the Renewed Sustainable Finance Strategy in July 2020, where specific points in relation to the green bond standard framework were raised, ESMA highlights the following key messages:
- The success of the green bond standard in EU will, to a large extent, be determined by whether it is seen as a reliable indicator of investment in sustainable economic activities. To ensure reliability and alignment with the Taxonomy, the green bond standard will require external reviewers conducting rigorous assessments of the green bond framework of an issuer.
- The best way to ensure high-quality assessments is to introduce a formal EU registration and supervision regime of these external reviewers. This will ensure that the entities conducting such assessments have adequate resources, are using robust methodologies, and have measures in place to protect against conflicts of interest.
- It is important to ensure that the final regime will not result in market concentration of external reviewers, which may disadvantage issuers, especially SMEs, as well as smaller external reviewers, while still ensuring that the market develops in a properly regulated and supervised way at EU level.
- It supports the development of a social EU Taxonomy as a prerequisite for reliable standards for social bonds.
ESMA concludes its response by reiterating its support for the work of EC, as EC finalizes the proposals, and reinforces its readiness to provide further views on the future green bond standard framework, as needed.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Green Bond Standard, ESG, Climate Change Risk, Sustainable Finance Strategy, Green Taxonomy, EC, ESMA
Previous ArticleESMA Publishes Work Program for 2021
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.