Featured Product

    BIS Examines Financial Stability Implications of Market Fragmentation

    October 01, 2019

    BIS published a working paper that examines the financial stability implications of fragmentation in the global financial markets. The paper reviews the degree of fragmentation in various markets and classifies its possible causes. It then reviews whether fragmentation is necessarily detrimental to financial stability, suggesting that various trade-offs exist. The review suggests that reducing fragmentation and enhancing financial stability are, in general, highly likely to be complementary. Still, fragmentation is not necessarily harmful for financial stability. In specific cases, some degree of fragmentation can actually serve to enhance financial stability.

    The paper identifies and reviews the possible causes of fragmentation—namely, natural barriers, market forces, policy actions and interventions other than financial regulatory actions, and financial regulation and its enforcement. The paper then proceeds to review the costs and benefits of fragmentation, mainly from a financial stability perspective, using examples from securities markets, international banking, and asset prices across countries. It concludes that whereas in some cases there appear to be no clear costs to financial stability, in other cases there might be some. The review also suggests there are clearly cases where (some type or degree of) fragmentation can serve to enhance financial stability. The next area covered is how regulation at the global level affects fragmentation. The last section of the paper builds on the analysis to review what actions may be called for. It argues for the need to develop a framework that can help identify cases where there are potential trade-offs.

    Fragmentation may be bad for financial stability. However, fragmentation and financial stability themselves may also be subject to a trade-off. The paper makes the following proposals by way of a more formal approach to review and, possibly, undertake policy actions.

    • The starting point is more thorough analysis. What needs to be assessed here is the overall social costs and benefits of fragmentation and this needs to be done across jurisdictions. The related question is whether the “bad” elements of fragmentation are prone to escalate to the level of systemic risk. A joint assessment of the causes and a possible trade-off could supply us with a menu of policy options.
    • The second step is to select from that menu the options that can reduce fragmentation while improving financial stability. The aim is to identify improvements along the upward sloping part of the “iso-quant” financial-stability-fragmentation curve. All the drivers involved, not just regulation, would need to be assessed. Such a review may well conclude that the answer to many of the outstanding questions is to continue harmonizing regulation and implementation and enhancing information-sharing processes regarding possible policy actions and the like.
    • Another, parallel step would be to encourage the private sector to provide (more of) its own solutions to complement public interventions. There are many examples of the private sector already using cooperative models to address fragmentation at the global level. For example, CLS Bank is playing a role in wholesale cross-border payments. Consideration is being given to developing more such private (interbank) settlement systems. Policymakers can only welcome that and other private sector approaches.
    • A final step is to intervene using the right tools. There are a number of elements to this. One is to choose the most efficient instrument with which to intervene. For example, there can be differences between price- and quantity-related regulations in terms of effectiveness and benefits in the presence of uncertainty. There is also much to learn from private-sector solutions that can be built. Another element is to allow for some state contingency in applying the instrument chosen; for example, barriers to the allocation of liquidity and capital are clearly more costly in times of stress. Analyzing and then addressing these elements will help ensure that the public-sector intervenes not just when necessary, but also with the most effective tools.

     

    Related Link: Working Paper

     

    Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Financial Stability, Financial Integration, Regulation and Supervision, Research, Market Fragmentation, Basel III, BIS

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    BCBS Consults on Revised Disclosures for Market Risk Framework

    BCBS launched a consultation on the revised disclosure requirements for the market risk framework for banks.

    November 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Examines Implementation of Resolution Regimes in Financial Sector

    FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions and sets out plans for further work.

    November 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Publishes Final Policy on Maintenance of TMTP Under Solvency II

    PRA published the policy statement (PS25/19) that contains the final supervisory statement (SS6/16) on maintenance of the transitional measure on technical provisions (TMTPs) under Solvency II.

    November 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Consults on Disclosure Templates of Sovereign Exposures of Banks

    BCBS published a consultation on the voluntary disclosure templates related to sovereign exposures of banks.

    November 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IAIS Adopts ComFrame, ICS, and Holistic Framework for Systemic Risk

    IAIS adopted a comprehensive set of reforms—Common Framework (ComFrame), Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) Version 2.0, and Holistic Framework for Systemic Risk—that will enable effective cross-border supervision of insurance groups and contribute to global financial stability.

    November 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Publishes Templates for Statistical Disclosures Under Solvency II

    PRA published templates for statistical disclosures, as required under Article 31(2) of the Solvency II Directive.

    November 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes Improvements to Derivatives and Hedging Standard

    FASB proposed an Accounting Standards Update, on codification improvements to hedge accounting under Topic 815, to clarify certain sections of the 2017 hedge accounting standard (Update 2017-12).

    November 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Approves Guidance to Assist in Transition to New Reference Rates

    FASB approved an Accounting Standards Update (Topic 848) to provide temporary, optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for, or recognizing the effects of, the reference rate reform on financial reporting.

    November 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS and MAS Launch Innovation Hub in Singapore

    BIS and MAS launched the BIS Innovation Hub Center in Singapore.

    November 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS and Industry to Create Framework for Adoption of Responsible AIDA

    MAS announced that it is working with financial industry partners to create a framework for financial institutions to promote the responsible adoption of Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (AIDA).

    November 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4142