The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks. Accompanying these are the updated prudential standards for capital adequacy and credit risk capital—that is, APS 110 on capital adequacy, APS 112 on the standardized approach to credit risk, and APS 113 on the internal ratings-based approach to credit risk; these standards will come into effect from January 01, 2023. APRA also launched a consultation on the guidance for these prudential standards to assist banks to prepare for the new framework, with the consultation period ending on March 11, 2022. APRA plans to update the associated reporting requirements and other related prudential standards in the year ahead.
Within the new framework, APRA has introduced a set of simplified capital requirements that can be applied to small, less complex banks (those with under $20 billion in assets and simple business models). The Basel framework has been developed primarily for large, internationally active banks and, while widely used worldwide, the cost of implementing the full framework for small banks may outweigh the benefits of prudential safety in doing so. The development of a simplified approach for smaller banks avoids unnecessary regulatory burden, without jeopardizing prudential safety, and is expected to benefit about three-quarters of domestic banks. The new framework will strengthen financial resilience by:
- ensuring existing high levels of capital adequacy are maintained
- providing more flexibility and responsiveness to risks in the operating environment
- being more risk-sensitive, through increasing capital requirements for higher risk lending and decreasing it for lower risks
- supporting competition by limiting differences in capital requirements between smaller and larger banks
- improving the comparability of bank capital ratios, both domestically and with global peers
- reducing operational burden for smaller banks
The framework introduces significant increase in flexibility, with the capital conservation buffer (CCB) of 3.5% for standardized banks and 5.75% for the major banks. This includes a 1.0% default setting for the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB). Additional safeguards were built into the framework in the form of better risk-sensitivity in the standardized approach and higher buffers and floors for advanced banks. APRA expects that all banks will ensure that they are ready to meet the minimum standards, when they commence, and seek to implement better practice in capital management in line with the intent of the reforms. This includes setting prudent capital targets with an adequate management buffer, updating capital projections and internal capital adequacy assessment processes (ICAAPs), and conducting stress testing on the new basis.
- News Release
- Updated Standards and Proposed Guidance
- Information Paper (PDF)
- Response to Consultation Feedback (PDF)
Effective Date: January 01, 2023
Comment Due Date: March 11, 2022 (Guidance)
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Regulatory Capital, Basel, Credit Risk, Guidance, APS 110, APS 112, APS 113, Standardized Approach, IRB Approach, Proportionality, APRA
Previous ArticleEC Finalizes Rules on Internal Approaches Benchmarking Exercise
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.