BCBS issued consultation on a set of limited, targeted, and final adjustments to the credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk framework. The revisions aim to align relevant parts of the revised CVA risk framework with the minimum capital requirements for market risk published in January 2019 as well as capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties. BCBS is seeking feedback on a possible adjustment to the overall calibration of capital requirements calculated under the CVA standardized and basic approaches. The annex to the paper includes the proposed specific amendments to the standards. The required implementation date of the revised CVA risk framework continues to be January 01, 2022. The comment period on the consultation ends on February 25, 2020.
The proposed adjustments comprise two types of revisions. The finalization of the market risk framework in January 2019 included changes to some of the market risk standardized approach risk-weights, which in turn impact the CVA framework. Given that the risk-weights of the CVA risk framework are largely based on the January 2016 market risk standard, BCBS is proposing to reflect the corresponding market risk revisions in the CVA risk framework. BCBS is proposing adjustments to the risk-weights in the CVA standardized approach (SA-CVA) for interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, and certain exposures subject to counterparty credit spread risk and reference credit spread risk. In addition, BCBS is proposing to introduce a new approach to calculate capital requirements for instruments with market values, depending on credit and equity indices, as well as a new formula for aggregating the CVA capital requirement, in line with the revisions to the market risk framework.
BCBS is also considering additional targeted revisions to the CVA risk framework. These revisions include adjusting the scope of portfolios subject to CVA risk capital requirements by excluding some securities financing transactions (SFTs) where the CVA risks stemming from such positions are not material and exempting certain client-cleared derivatives. Moreover, BCBS is considering reducing the margin period of risk for some centrally cleared client derivatives in the SA-CVA, which would bring the CVA requirement more in line with the counterparty credit risk (CCR) framework and further incentivize banks to centrally clear over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. Finally, BCBS is seeking feedback on whether a possible calibration adjustment of the SA-CVA is warranted. This would be achieved by changing the existing multiplier mCVA from its current value of 1.25 to [1 to 1.25]. BCBS is considering revising the calibration of the basic approach (BA-CVA) to have an appropriate relative calibration between the SA-CVA and the BA-CVA. Any such adjustments would have to be based on sound empirical evidence.
Comment Due Date: February 25, 2020
Effective Date: January 01, 2022
Keywords: International, Banking, CVA, CVA Risk, Minimum Capital Requirements, Basel III, Market Risk, CCP, SA-CVA, OTC Derivatives, Credit Risk, BA-CVA, Securities Financing Transactions, BCBS
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/763 that lays down implementing technical standards for supervisory reporting and public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
The private sector working group of ECB on euro risk-free rates published the recommendations to address events that would trigger fallbacks in the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)-related contracts, along with the €STR-based EURIBOR fallback rates (rates that could be used if a fallback is triggered).
Bundesbank published a list of "EntryPoints" that are accepted in its reporting system; the list provides taxonomy version and name of the module against each EntryPoint.
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
Asia Pacific Australia Banking APS 111 Capital Adequacy Regulatory Capital Basel RBNZ APRA
ESMA published the final guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers.
EBA published annual data for two key concepts and indicators in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) Directive—available financial means and covered deposits.
OSFI has set out the schedule for release of draft guidance on the management of technology risks by federally regulated financial institutions and private pension plans.
MAS updated rules for new housing loans by banks and finance companies.