APRA Finalizes Guidance on Superannuation Business Performance Review
APRA published the final prudential practice guide SPG 516 on business performance review. SPG 516 provides guidance to the superannuation industry on undertaking the new APRA requirements for an annual Business Performance Review under prudential standard SPS 515 on Strategic Planning and Member Outcomes and the new legislated member outcomes assessment. APRA also published its response to submissions on the SPG 516 consultation. SPG 516 is the final piece of guidance to support SPS 515 and it commences on January 01, 2020.
The proposed revisions to SPG 516 support the amendments made to SPS 515, which were finalized on August 28, 2019. The key changes to SPS 515 were the introduction of the Business Performance Review and requirements to support the outcomes assessment required under section 52 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act). APRA received nine public submissions and met with various stakeholders during the consultation period, including conducting two roundtables in Sydney and Melbourne. Overall, submissions were broadly supportive of the revisions to SPG 516. However, some drafting suggestions and issues were raised while some additional guidance on aspects of the Business Performance Review and legislated outcomes assessment were also sought. Hence, the final amendments to SPG 516 are included to:
- Provide clarity in including benchmarking and comparisons, using available data sources, to help assess relative performance of products based on the outcomes assessment factors under section 52(11) of the SIS Act
- Provide clarity on how a registrable superannuation entity licensee might incorporate both the outcomes assessment and Business Performance Review into its business planning timetable
- Reduce uncertainty in a number of other areas such as expanding the expectations in considering insurance product design issues under the cohort analysis of Business Performance Review; clarifying expectations for the cohort analysis under the Business Performance Review for members holding defined benefit and retirement products; improving the clarity of the section covering the comparison component of the outcomes assessment for MySuper products; and removing unnecessary and duplicative drafting from the insurance strategy assessment factor section.
APRA will also monitor the implementation of the publications of the outcomes assessment information against the guidance set out in SPG 516. Where there are industry-wide deficiencies in the quality of publications on registrable superannuation entity licensees’ websites, APRA will update its prudential guidance to address this issue and will engage with relevant registrable superannuation entity licensees. APRA, however, made some changes to the publication section to improve clarity. APRA and ASIC will also work together closely as the implementation of Design and Distribution Obligations approaches in 2021 and consider whether specific guidance on this issue is required.
The Business Performance Review and outcomes assessment requirements represent a new and complex undertaking for many registrable superannuation entity licensees. APRA will be looking for registrable superannuation entity licensees to implement these new requirements on a best endeavor basis during the first year of implementation. However, APRA expects that the depth and sophistication of the analysis in Business Performance Review and outcomes assessment will improve in subsequent iterations as better practice emerges and practical issues are addressed; for example, the availability of additional, more granular data and consideration of a wider range of member cohorts. One way for a registrable superannuation entity licensee to begin this improvement process is to undertake a trial outcomes assessment in 2020, covering all or a subset of its MySuper and choice products. APRA expects that a trial outcomes assessment would provide registrable superannuation entity licensees with insights into the methodology, data, and publication issues that may arise in respect of the outcomes assessment.
Related Links
Effective Date: January 01, 2020
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Insurance, Pensions, Superannuation, SPG 516, SPS 515, Business Performance Review, Outcomes Assessment, APRA
Previous Article
MAS Consults on Regulatory Approach for Payment Token DerivativesRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
