FSI Presents Results of Analysis on System-Wide Bank Stress Tests
FSI published a paper that presents the findings of a comparative analysis on the system-wide stress tests for banks in the euro area, Japan, Switzerland, and the United States. The paper identifies three building blocks in the setup of any stress test—governance, implementation, and outcomes—and relates them to the policy objectives, which can be micro-prudential or macro-prudential.
On the basis of an extensive review of the choices that authorities need to make about the design of a stress test within each of these building blocks, the paper argues that stress tests are most effective when their design is fully aligned with the policy objectives associated with them. This is because micro-prudential and macro-prudential objectives may require different approaches. Consistency with the Basel Committee's high-level principles for stress testing is an important step in this regard. Stress tests are best used in combination with other tools available to the authorities to achieve their policy objectives, such as systemic risk monitoring or capital planning reviews.
The analysis suggests that stress testing is being continually improved and further developments could help to enhance the implementation and the policy use of stress tests. There are several areas in which stress tests could be improved, such as, on the implementation side, the joint treatment of solvency and liquidity risks, or the specification of second-round, spillover and contagion effects. On the policy side, more authorities could use stress tests as an input to the calibration of macro-prudential measures. Additionally, stress tests could be further integrated into regular supervisory reviews.
Some of these changes will be driven by progress in research or advances in technology, while others will be dependent on gaining enough practical experience, especially in the macro-prudential sphere. From a global perspective, a dialog among relevant authorities regarding a common scenario design for large and cross-border active banks would be a helpful addition to the stress testing landscape.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Stress Testing, Systemic Risk, Macro-prudential Policy, FSI
Previous Article
IASB Publishes November Issue of the Investor UpdateRelated Articles
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Fourth Update for March 2019EBA published answers to five questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.
March 22, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ECB Updates Validation Checks and List of Identifiers Under AnaCreditECB updated the AnaCredit validation checks (Version 1.4) and the list of national identifiers (version 2.4) for AnaCredit reporting.
March 21, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
BCBS Publishes Results of the Basel III Monitoring ExerciseBCBS published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on data as of June 30, 2018.
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA, FCA, and PRA Agree on MoU Template for Supervisory CooperationEBA, FCA, and PRA announced that they have agreed on a template for the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that sets out the expectations for supervisory cooperation and information-sharing arrangements between UK and EU/European Economic Area national authorities.
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
HKMA Publishes CoP on Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements of BanksHKMA issued, in relation to the Financial Institutions Resolution (Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements—Banking Sector) Rules (LAC Rules) a chapter of a code of practice (LAC CoP) under section 196 of the Financial Institutions Resolution Ordinance (FIRO).
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Publishes Reports Monitoring the Implementation of Basel III in EUEBA published two reports measuring the impact of implementing the final Basel III reforms and monitoring the implementation of liquidity measures in EU.
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
BCBS Publishes Results of Survey on Proportionality in Bank RegulationBCBS published a report presenting the results of a survey conducted on proportionality practices in bank regulation and supervision.
March 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Adopt Interim Rule to Facilitate Transfers of Legacy SwapsUS Agencies (FCA, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) are adopting and inviting comments on an interim final rule.
March 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Updates List of Other Systemically Important Institutions in EUEBA updated the 2018 list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU. The list also reflects the additional capital buffers that the relevant authorities have set for the identified O-SIIs.
March 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
HKMA Expects Banks to Manage Risks Related to Crypto-Asset ExposuresHKMA issued a statement announcing that it expects authorized institutions to take note of the BCBS statement on crypto-assets and its prudential expectations.
March 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
