The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees. The guide covers sound practices in areas such as governance, risk management, scenario analysis, and disclosure of climate-related financial risks. The guidance is principles-based, is aligned with recommendations from the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), and has been developed in consultation with various domestic and international peer regulators. APRA also published its response to the feedback received to the consultation on the draft guidance.
To its April 2021 consultation on CPG 229, APRA received nearly 50 submissions, with stakeholders broadly welcoming the draft guidance but some requesting further guidance and clarifications. Consequently, APRA amended CPG 229 with respect to capital adequacy, the use of climate-related targets, and disclosing key design features of scenario analysis. Despite this additional clarity, The principles-based approach in the guidance aims to ensure flexibility, applicability to a wide range of institutions, adaptability to the evolving external environment, and complementarity to the existing risk management and governance requirements. With respect to the scenario analysis and stress testing, APRA guidance stipulates that, in fulfilling their obligations under CPS 220, it would be prudent for institutions to develop capabilities in climate risk scenario analysis and stress testing, or to have access to external scenario analysis and stress testing capabilities. This analysis would inform their risk identification over both the shorter- and longer-term. Scenario analysis and stress testing for climate risks is a developing area and APRA expects approaches to evolve and mature over time; however, the expectation of future improvements in approach is not a justification for delaying its use. With respect to disclosures, APRA anticipates the demand for reliable and timely climate risk disclosure will increase over time, and for institutions with international activities there is a need to be prepared to comply with mandatory climate risk disclosures in other jurisdictions. APRA considers it better practice for any disclosures to be produced in line with the framework established by the TCFD.
APRA encourages regulated entities to begin using the finalized guidance immediately to enhance their management of climate change financial risks in a manner that is appropriate to their business and the particular circumstances. Next year, APRA intends to undertake a survey to help gauge the alignment between institutions’ management of climate change financial risks, the guidance set out in CPG 229, and the TCFD. In addition, APRA continues to advance its climate-related program of activities, including the climate vulnerability assessment that is underway with Australia’s five largest banks. This Prudential Practice Guide is designed to be read together with prudential standards on risk management (CPS 220 and SPS 220) as well as prudential standards on governance (CPS 510 and SPS 510), but does not address all prudential requirements in relation to risk management and governance. Subject to meeting the requirements of the prudential standards, an APRA-regulated institution has the flexibility to configure its approach to climate risk management in a manner best suited to achieving its business objectives. Not all of the practices outlined in this Prudential Practice Guide are relevant for every institution, and some aspects may vary depending upon the size, business mix, and complexity of the institution.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Disclosures, Scenario Analysis, CPG 229, TCFD, Stress Testing, Reporting, APRA
Previous ArticleUS Agencies Issue Statement on Crypto-Asset Policy Initiatives
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/25, which supplements the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR or Regulation 2019/2033) with respect to the regulatory technical standards specifying the methods for measuring the K-factors referred to in Article 15 of the IFR.
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that assesses the ways in which platform-based business models can affect financial inclusion, competition, financial stability and consumer protection.
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published the list of identified financial conglomerates for 2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) granted license to Barclays Bank PLC and Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to operate as foreign authorized deposit-taking institutions under the Banking Act 1959.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the Delegated Regulation 2015/35, which supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published an Opinion on the scale and impact of de-risking in European Union and the steps that competent authorities should take to tackle unwarranted de-risking.
The French Financial Markets Authority (AMF) published its 2022 work priorities, along with the supervisory priorities for 2022.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a determination on a request for an exemption, by RBC US Group Holdings LLC, from certain requirements of the rule implementing the qualified financial contracts (QFC) recordkeeping requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced that publication of 24 LIBOR settings has ended and that, going forward, the 6 most widely used sterling and Japanese yen settings will be published using a changed methodology.
The People’s Bank of China (PBC) formulated the recently issued Fintech Development Plan (2022 to 2025) under the Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025) for National Economic and Social Development and the Long-Range Objectives through the Year 2035.