ESRB published a report that analyzes the financial stability risks and vulnerabilities related to the commercial real estate markets in EU. The report studies both common trends across EU countries as well as country-specific vulnerabilities and finally discusses the possible policy instruments available to address such vulnerabilities.
The report reveals that banking sector in some countries remains highly exposed to commercial real estate, but non-banks and foreign investors also seem to be playing an increasingly important role in commercial real estate markets. Some instruments and measures, which mainly target the banking sector, are available to macro-prudential authorities seeking to address commercial real estate-related vulnerabilities. EU legislation, through the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV), provides instruments that can address commercial real estate-related vulnerabilities in the banking sector using capital-based measures, which include increased risk-weights, loss given default (LGD), or own fund requirements. Moreover, the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) includes instruments that can be used to address commercial real estate-related vulnerabilities in investment funds through leverage limits as well as liquidity management tools such as the suspension of redemptions. Depending on the availability of borrower-based measures in national legislation, measures such as loan-to-value (LTV) limits and debt service coverage ratio/interest coverage ratio (DSCR/ICR) floors can also be used to address commercial real estate-related vulnerabilities.
The report highlights that capital-based measures may also be implemented to increase the resilience of the financial sector and to influence cyclical developments in commercial real estate markets. The effective regulation of risk-weights for commercial real estate exposures in many countries would require adjustments under the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach. This is because risk-weights for most of the bank exposures are based on IRB models in many countries, although most countries have implemented measures to increase commercial real estate risk-weights using the standardized approach. However, EU legislation limits countries’ possibilities with regard to correcting or increasing risk-weights for IRB banks to address commercial real estate vulnerabilities. Finally, the report recommends that, given the rising importance of non-bank and cross-border financing in commercial real estate markets, it is important to investigate whether new instruments should be made available and, in addition, implemented beyond banking.
Related Link: Report (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Commercial Real Estate, CRD IV, IRB Approach, Standardized Approach, Macro-prudential Measures, ESRB
Previous ArticleHKMA Updates Enhanced Competency Framework on Cybersecurity
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.