ESRB published a report identifying a shortlist of options for additional provisions, measures, and instruments that ESRB deems sufficiently promising to warrant further work. The report complements the work undertaken by EIOPA and reaches broadly similar conclusions. The shortlisted options would address the key systemic risk types by targeting several significant systemic amplifiers, sectoral vulnerabilities, and transmission channels.
The shortlisted options in the report were selected on the basis of expert judgment since, as Solvency II has only recently come into effect, the data reported do not yet support a comprehensive time series analysis. The shortlisted options reflect the specificities of the (re)insurance business and their functioning naturally differs from the toolkit that was developed for other financial sectors (for example, banking). The shortlisted options would form part of a comprehensive regulatory framework. First, as part of making (re)insurers safer to protect policyholders, the shortlisted options include a proportionate extension and enhancement of micro-prudential reporting requirements. Second, as part of providing legal certainty in case an (re)insurer runs into difficulties and to ensure that any failure is orderly, they confirm the financial stability benefits of a harmonized EU-wide recovery and resolution framework. Third, as part of a macro-prudential toolkit to target systemic risks, they include the possibility for the following:
- A power for authorities to impose, entity-based and/or activity/behavior-based market-wide capital increases and dividend restrictions in situations in which (re)insurance market developments could generate systemic risk
- Symmetric capital requirements for cyclical risks
- Liquidity requirements for (re)insurers with a vulnerable liquidity profile
- A discretionary power for authorities to intervene in cases of mass lapses
- Instruments to target bank-like activities to ensure cross-sectoral consistency of macro-prudential policy
With the exception of the symmetric capital requirements for cyclical risks, which partly interact with measures already present in Solvency II, in particular the volatility adjustment (VA) and the matching adjustment (MA), the shortlisted options address the macro-prudential aspects not captured by the current EU regulation. Further work should consider international developments, changes in current regulation, and determine the appropriate level of legislation. As the potential implementation of any of the shortlisted provisions, measures, and instruments would require legislative changes, it would typically be accompanied by an impact assessment. One of the key elements of any future work would be to consider the extent of the legislative changes needed to implement certain provisions, measures or instruments and to consider the appropriate level of legislation.
Related Link: ESRB Report (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Macro-prudential Measures, Systemic Risk, ESRB
Sam leads the quantitative research team within the CreditEdge™ research group. In this role, he develops novel risk and forecasting solutions for financial institutions while providing thought leadership on related trends in global financial markets.
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.