EBA published a report presenting a set of detailed recommendations for EC on the harmonization of practices and processes applicable to the significant risk transfer, or SRT, assessment in securitization transactions. The report makes recommendations for the assessment of structural features of securitization transactions, the application of significant risk transfer quantitative tests, and the supervisory process for assessing significant risk transfer in individual transactions. In the report, EBA also identifies shortcomings in certain in force Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) provisions that are significantly detrimental to the effectiveness of the supervisory assessment of significant risk transfer. Thus, the report sets out several recommendations on desirable amendments to the CRR that could correct those shortcomings and improve the significant risk transfer framework.
The EBA recommendations aim to enhance the efficiency, consistency, and predictability of the supervisory significant risk transfer assessment within the securitization framework in the following ways:
- Securitization transactions that exhibit ineligible structural features should not qualify for significant risk transfer recognition. Ineligible structural features could include call options other than those specified in this report and early termination clauses other than those specified in this report.
- Securitization transactions that exhibit one or several of the other structural features outlined in this report should comply with a set of safeguards to qualify for significant risk transfer recognition and to be eligible for the fast‐track significant risk transfer assessment process.
- The originator should submit within its risk transfer self‐assessment to the competent authority a quantitative analysis of how the structural features interact in the context of the transaction and affect the risk transferred to the third parties.
CRR uses two sets of tests to measure significant risk transfer. The mezzanine and the first‐loss tests use quantitative formulae to assess the "significance" of risk transfer. To address certain limitations in the significant risk transfer tests, the report recommends supplementing the first‐loss test with a requirement that the first‐loss tranche has a minimum thickness. The report also recommends providing two new commensurate risk transfer tests: a principle‐based approach test and a quantitative test. The report explains that significant risk transfer assessments should be subject to a common supervisory dual‐track process, whereby "qualifying securitizations" would follow a distinctive fast track, while competent authorities would be able to apply a longer and more in‐depth process to the assessment of "non‐qualifying securitizations." The report also recommends harmonizing the preliminary significant risk transfer notice that originators should submit to the competent authority to start the assessment process as well as the transaction documents that should be made available to the competent authority to substantiate the assessment.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Significant Risk Transfer, CRR, Basel, Securitization Framework, SRT, EC, EBA
Previous ArticleDNB Publishes Several Reporting Updates for Banks in November 2020
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft implementing technical standards on Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed to update the guidelines on the data collection exercise on high earners and the remuneration benchmarking exercise under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) announced the appointment of Mr. Ravi Menon, the Managing Director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), as its new Chair for a two-year term.
The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules on related-party transactions and outsourcing risks.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) announced successful test integration of wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) settlement with commercial banks, as part of the Project Helvetia.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is consulting on the draft Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628), or FIRO, Code of Practice chapter on liquidity and funding in resolution, until March 14, 2022.