Featured Product

    FSI Assesses Basel Framework Implementation in Non-BCBS Jurisdictions

    November 23, 2018

    FSI published a paper that explores the state of implementation of the key Basel standards, while outlining the associated proportionality practices, in 100 jurisdictions that are not members of BCBS. The prudential requirements covered in this study include risk-based capital (RBC) rules, leverage requirements, two quantitative liquidity standards, and the large exposures standard, which are collectively referred to as Pillar 1 requirements. The paper also catalogs a range of proportionality practices applied in non-BCBS jurisdictions, providing a reference for authorities that seek to tailor the Basel framework to fit their country-specific circumstances.

    The findings state that all jurisdictions have adopted some version of the Basel RBC regime, while most have implemented, in some manner, quantitative liquidity standards and the large exposures rule. Of the Pillar 1 requirements, most of the surveyed jurisdictions have adopted the RBC regime in various forms, the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR), and some version of the large exposures standard. All 100 jurisdictions have adopted some iteration of the RBC regime (Basel I, II, or III), while 81 countries reported the adoption of either the LCR (54 jurisdictions) or domestic liquidity rules (27). Similarly, 91 jurisdictions have adopted the large exposures rule, based on either the 2014 large exposures standard (14), some variation of the 1991 standard (38), or their own domestic large exposure rule (39). Despite its relative simplicity, the leverage ratio has been adopted by only 16 surveyed jurisdictions, with another four countries applying a domestic leverage rule. Similarly, the NSFR has been adopted by 15 jurisdictions. 

    The lack of global prudential standards for non-internationally active banks has led national authorities to implement a range of proportionality approaches. In their implementation of Basel standards, nearly all jurisdictions apply proportionality, simplifying standards in some cases and applying more stringent requirements in others. As countries shift to the Basel III RBC regime, more extensive proportionality strategies are applied. In practice, jurisdictions follow one or a combination of three proportionality strategies with respect to the Basel III RBC regime. Within the RBC regime, the market risk capital requirement is most often subject to a proportionate approach. The perceived complexity of the market risk framework has led many countries to either exempt all banks from the market risk capital requirements (Basel I countries) or to exempt banks with small trading books from the market risk capital charge (Basel III countries).

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Basel III, Basel Framework, Proportionality, RBC Regime, BCBS

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    SEC Finalizes Capital and Margin Requirements for Security-Based Swaps

    SEC adopted a package of rules and rule amendments to establish capital, margin, and segregation requirements for security-based swaps, under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act.

    August 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Revises Prudential Provisioning Expectations for New NPEs

    ECB is revising its supervisory expectations for prudential provisioning of new non-performing exposures (NPEs) specified in the “Addendum to the ECB Guidance to banks on non-performing loans” (Addendum)

    August 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CFTC Proposes to Revise Information Collection on Margin Requirements

    CFTC is requesting comments on the burdens associated with certain aspects of the Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants (final rule).

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB to Delay Effective Date for Insurance Contracts Standard

    FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update that would grant all insurance companies that issue long-duration contracts, such as life insurance and annuities, additional time to apply the standard that addresses this area of financial reporting.

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Phase 2 of Technical Package on Reporting Framework 2.9

    EBA published phase 2 of its technical package on the reporting framework 2.9, which includes validation rules, Data Point Model (DPM) data dictionary, and XBRL taxonomies.

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Responses to Its Consultation Related to SME Financing

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on a report on the evaluation of the effects of financial regulatory reforms on small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) financing.

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Revises Related Entities Standard for Banks

    APRA published a strengthened prudential standard APS 222 on associations with related entities, with the aim to mitigate contagion risk within banking groups.

    August 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA and ESMA Issue Joint Response to EC Letter on Crypto-Assets

    EBA and ESMA issued a joint response to the EC letter, from July 19, 2019, on crypto-assets.

    August 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB on Responses to Consultation on Wind-Down of Trading Portfolios

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on the solvent wind-down of the derivatives and trading book portfolio of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).

    August 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Responses to Consultation on Resolvability Disclosures

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on disclosures for resolution planning and resolvability of banks.

    August 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3681