General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
November 22, 2017

BIS published a working paper on the issuance of contingent convertible capital securities (CoCos) and bank fragility. The promise of CoCos as a bail-in solution has been the subject of considerable theoretical analysis and debate, but little is known about their effects in practice. In this paper, BIS undertakes the first comprehensive empirical analysis of bank CoCos, which represent a market segment comprising over 730 instruments totaling USD 521 billion.

The working paper describes the current state of CoCo issuance and presents an overview of the sample data set. The data set used consists exclusively of CoCos issued by banks and excludes those issued by insurance companies and other non-bank financial institutions. The focus is on CoCos that have at least one (mechanical or discretionary) contractual trigger. The paper highlights that two sets of empirical exercises were conducted. The first exercise examined the determinants of CoCo issuance while the second exercise evaluated the impact of CoCo issuance on the credit default swap (CDS) spreads and equity prices of issuing banks. The empirical analysis leads to the following four main findings:

  • The propensity to issue a CoCo is higher for larger and better-capitalized banks
  • CoCo issues result in statistically significant declines in issuers' CDS spreads, indicating that they generate risk-reduction benefits and lower costs of debt. This is especially true for CoCos that convert into equity, have mechanical triggers, and are classified as Additional Tier 1 instruments
  • CoCos with only discretionary triggers do not have a significant impact on CDS spreads
  • CoCo issues have no statistically significant impact on stock prices, except for principal write-down CoCos with a high trigger level, which have a positive effect

CoCos are hybrid capital securities that absorb losses when the capital of the issuing bank falls below a certain level. CoCos can absorb losses either by converting into common equity or by suffering a principal write-down. 

 

Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)

Keywords: International, Banking, CoCo, Basel III, Bank Capital Regulation, BIS

Related Insights
News

PRA Delays Final Direction on Reporting of Private Securitizations

PRA and FCA have delayed the issuance of final direction, including the final template, on reporting of private securitizations, from January 15, 2019 to the end of January 2019.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Finalizes Market Risk Capital Framework and Work Program for 2019

BCBS published the final framework for market risk capital requirements and its work program for 2019. Also published was an explanatory note to provide a non-technical description of the overall market risk framework, the changes that have been incorporated into in this version of the framework and impact of the framework.

January 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for January 2019

EBA published answers to 13 questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

January 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Proposes to Amend Supervisory Statement on Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FASB Issues Q&A on Estimating Credit Loss Reserves

FASB issued a question-and-answer (Q&A) document that addresses particular issues related to the weighted average remaining maturity (WARM) method for estimating the allowance for credit losses.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Updates Reporting and Supplemental Instructions for Form FR Y-9C

FED published the updated reporting instructions and supplemental instructions for the FR Y-9C reporting form. The reporting frequency for FR Y-9C is quarterly, as of the last calendar day of the quarter.

January 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Updates Policy on Liquidity Reporting Under FSA047/048 and PRA110

PRA published the policy statement PS1/19 that provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/18 titled "Liquidity reporting: FSA047 and FSA048" and the proposal in CP16/18, which intended to correct the level of consolidation of the PRA110 reporting requirements.

January 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Proposes to Amend Company-Run Stress Testing Requirements

FED proposed to modify company-run stress testing requirements to conform with the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

January 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ESMA RTS on Supervisory Cooperation Under Securitization Regulation

ESMA issued the final regulatory technical standards (RTS) for cooperation between competent authorities and ESAs under the Securitization Regulation (2017/2402).

January 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ESAs Publish Joint Report on Regulatory Sandboxes and Innovation Hubs

ESAs published a joint report providing a comparative analysis of the innovation facilitators (that is, regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs) established to date within the EU.

January 07, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2461