The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published its annual report on the use of capital add-ons during 2020. The analysis included in the report is based on 2020 year-end data collected under Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II) as reported by the solo undertakings or insurance groups from the European Economic Area; this was complemented by a dedicated survey for national competent authorities that entailed both qualitative and quantitative questions.
The objective of the capital add-on measure is to ensure that the regulatory capital requirements reflect the risk profile of the solo undertaking or of the insurance group. Therefore, it is important that national competent authorities use it when needed, with the aim to ensure a high degree of supervisory convergence in its application. It is also important to maintain a level playing field regarding the setting of capital add-ons. During 2020, two national competent authorities that set capital add-ons in the previous years no longer set capital add-ons in 2020. This situation led to a number of capital add-ons set at the end of 2020 even lower than in 2019. In 2020, seven national competent authorities set capital add-ons to nine solo undertakings (six non-life and three life undertakings respectively), while, in 2019, nine national competent authorities had set capital add-ons to ten solo undertakings, including two life, seven non-life undertakings and one composite (excluding the capital add-ons set by the UK in the past). For groups, similarly to 2019, no capital add-ons were set during 2020.
Due to the low number of capital add-ons, the weight of capital add-ons imposed on undertakings using the standard formula remains very low overall in 2020 (that is, less than 0.1% of the total Solvency Capital Requirement of all undertakings). However, it remains significant when considering the amount at individual level accounting for 25% of the total Solvency Capital Requirement of the undertakings with capital add-ons. Although there is a wide range in its distribution (from 86% to 1%), in all cases (except for one) the capital add-on increases the Solvency Capital Requirement by at least 10%. Following the findings of the survey, in view of a decreasing number of capital add-ons at an already low level, EIOPA will continue to monitor the usage of capital add-ons and pay attention on the proposals made by national competent authorities on how to make a more efficient use of this tool in the future.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Reinsurance, Solvency II, SCR, Capital Add-Ons, Solvency Capital Requirement, EIOPA
Previous ArticleEC Consults on Review of Mortgage Credit Directive
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.