ECB published results of the financial stability review in November 2019. The financial stability review assesses developments relevant for financial stability, including identifying and prioritizing the main sources of systemic risk and vulnerabilities for the euro area financial system. This issue of the review contains two special features: one examines how and where consolidation could help banks to improve their profitability while the other special feature discusses ways in which the measurement of banks’ systemic footprint can be complemented with new indicators. The review also includes eight boxes, including one that examines the impact of cross-border transactions on real estate markets and one that considers the implications of misconduct costs for banks.
The review highlights that downside risks to global and euro area economic growth have increased and continue to create financial stability challenges. The euro area banking sector has increased its resilience in recent years. However, slow progress in improving underlying profitability and renewed cyclical headwinds may hamper the ability of banks to respond to downside risks to growth. Non-performing loan (NPL) ratios of banks have improved slightly further since the previous financial stability review, driven by solid loan growth and continued, albeit slowing, reductions in NPLs. Going forward, weaker economic activity and the related increase in new default inflows may make further reductions in NPL ratios more challenging. Banks’ solvency positions appear resilient to the materialization of the main financial stability risks in an adverse scenario. The previous upward trend of bank solvency ratios has come to a halt in recent quarters. Management buffers remain sizable on aggregate though, but a significant part of these is likely to be consumed by the Basel III finalization package, with systemically important institutions being particularly affected.
Under the baseline scenario of the new macro-micro model of ECB, the solvency position of euro area significant credit institutions is projected to improve; however, under the adverse scenario, the euro area banking system would experience a reduction of up to 3.1 percentage points in the common equity tier 1 ratio. At the individual bank level, the majority of euro area significant institutions would remain above the common equity tier 1 capital requirement. Targeted macro-prudential policy measures are in place to address vulnerabilities in the banking sector and real estate markets, but the toolkit for non-banks needs to be further developed. Macro-prudential instruments could be used to mitigate some of the increase in euro area vulnerabilities, highlighting the importance of a continuation of the efforts to strengthen resilience to adverse shocks. Seven euro area countries have announced a positive CCyB rate, with rates ranging from 0.25% to 2.00%. In general, a greater availability of a releasable buffer in the form of a CCyB would be useful in the euro area.
The review notes that non-banks, such as investment funds, insurance companies, and pension funds, have continued to take on more risk and have increased their exposure to riskier segments of the corporate and sovereign sectors. In the event of a sudden repricing of financial assets, growing credit and liquidity risk in some parts of the euro area non-bank financial sector—coupled with higher leverage in investment funds—may lead non-banks to respond in ways that cause stress to spread to the wider financial system.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Pensions, Financial Stability Review, Macro-Prudential Policy, NPLs, Systemic Risk, ECB
Previous ArticleBCBS Consults on Design of Prudential Treatment for Crypto-Assets
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) proposed to amend the supervisory statement on supervision of run-off undertakings that are subject to Solvency II regulation.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.