The BCBS Task Force on Climate-related Financial Risks (TFCR), which was established in February 2020, held a virtual workshop in October 2020. The TFCR is undertaking analytical work related to the transmission channels of climate-related financial risks to the banking sector and the measurement methodologies of such risks. The information gathered during the workshop will contribute to the development of the analytical reports of the taskforce. Overall, there was broad agreement on the value of strengthening cooperation and knowledge-sharing among banks, supervisors, and policy makers, to address climate-related financial risks in a more harmonized and efficient manner.
The taskforce met with senior representatives from internationally active banks and associated industry associations to discuss how banks assess and address climate-related financial risks in practice. At the workshop, panelists from internationally active banks shared their views regarding transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking sector and individual banks. They also discussed methodologies used or being considered to measure climate-related financial risks and the use of the methodologies in risk management procedures of banks. Banks reported progress and future work in incorporating climate-related financial risks into existing risk management frameworks and governance structures, which requires making adjustments and enhancements to reflect the unique and complex nature of climate-related risks. Panelists highlighted the benefits of international coordination in developing regulatory requirements, reporting standards and disclosure expectations. Several panelists identified the potential benefits of principles-based guidance from international standard-setting bodies to align the development and phasing-in of climate risk requirements.
With respect to climate risk stress testing, panelists described the role of scenario analysis and models in quantifying transition and physical risks, noting the considerable uncertainty surrounding the scale and speed at which climate change will occur, which makes assumptions difficult to narrow down. Moreover, the longer-term time horizon over which the most severe scenarios may materialize is beyond the existing risk measurement or planning horizon of banks. Panelists discussed limitations with respect to data availability and quality as well as challenges in translating climate scenarios into financial risks parameters. Banks noted they are considering how to best translate the results of climate scenario analysis into financial planning and use the results to drive internal decision making to address these risks. Panelists described efforts to enhance scenario analysis and narrow the gaps on assumptions on climate scenarios. The NGFS Climate Scenarios were identified as being helpful in providing a common starting point for analyzing climate risks.
Related Link: Workshop Update
Keywords: International, Banking, TFCR, Scenario Analysis, NGFS, Climate Change Risk, Disclosures, ESG, BCBS
Previous ArticleAPRA Explains Capital Treatment of a COVID Loan Scheme for Banks
BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.
In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.