ESMA Publishes Preliminary Report on Carbon Market in EU
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published a preliminary report on the carbon market in the European Union (EU). The report responds to the request made by the European Commission (EC) to ESMA in its Communication on energy prices for a preliminary analysis of European emission allowances (EUAs) and derivatives on EUAs. ESMA will conduct an in-depth analysis of the carbon market in EU based on data sources available to securities regulators under European legislation. ESMA will deliver its final report to the EC in early 2022. EC, taking into account ESMA’s final report, will assess whether there is a need for targeted actions in the carbon market in EU.
The report first presents an overview of the financial regulatory environment for the carbon market under the Market Abuse Regulation, the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation as well as the tools available to securities supervisors to fulfil their responsibilities. It then presents a preliminary assessment of recent market developments in the carbon market. The report, based on commercial data, also provides an analysis of price evolution and volatility in EUAs and derivatives on EUAs. Weekly position reports in respect of derivatives on EUAs were used for the initial assessment of active counterparties. ESMA, in its preliminary analysis, has identified the following:
- The number of counterparties holding a position on EUA futures has tended to increase since 2018 in all categories of counterparties, in relatively homogeneous proportions in line with the observed expansion of the EU Emissions Trading System market.
- Open positions are to a large extent, and almost evenly, held by investment firms/credit institutions (40% to 47% depending on the period considered) and by non-financial counterparties (45% to 50%); however, the (remaining ~8%) percentage of open positions, held by investment funds and other financial counterparties, remains relatively low.
- The breakdown of open positions between the various categories of counterparties does not appear to have significantly changed since 2018 and is broadly in line with the expected functioning of the market, where non-financial entities buy EUA futures to hedge their carbon price exposure, while financial counterparties act as intermediaries to facilitate trading and provide liquidity to the market.
Related Link
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Insurance, Low-Carbon Economy, MiFid, EMIR, MAR, Sustainable Finance, ESG, Derivatives, Carbon Markets, ESMA
Previous Article
EBA Proposes SREP Framework and Endorses Equivalence Decision of ECRelated Articles
APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
APRA Finalizes Guidance on Management of Climate Change Risks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
EBA Publishes Single Rulebook Q&A Updates in November 2021
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
EC Proposes New Measures Under Capital Markets Union Package
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
European Council Adopts Position on Digital Finance Package Proposals
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
PRA Proposes Rulebook Changes; BoE Extends BEEDS Testing Window
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
FED Outlines Lending Conditions and Supervisory Activities in H1 2021
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
EBA Publishes Standards to Calculate Risk-Weights of CIUs Under CRR
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
APRA Expects Boards to Strengthen Ability to Oversee Cyber Resilience
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.
