IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan. IASB will divide the post-implementation review of IFRS 9 into phases with the classification and measurement requirements of IFRS 9 being in the first phase, which involves an initial identification and assessment of the matters to be examined. IASB decided to begin the review in October 2020.
When developing IFRS 9, IASB divided its project into three phases—classification and measurement, impairment, and hedge accounting. At the October 2020 meeting, IASB decided to also divide the post-implementation review of the standard into phases, starting with the review of the classification and measurement requirements. In the first stage, IASB developed a single principle-based approach to the classification and measurement of financial assets. IASB also addressed the so-called "own credit" issue by requiring that the effects of changes in the credit risk of financial liabilities designated under the fair value option are presented in other comprehensive income. The impairment requirements and hedge accounting requirements will be reviewed later, when more information is available about the application and effects of those requirements.
IASB is required to conduct a Post-implementation Review of each new IFRS Standard or major amendment. This review is an opportunity to assess the effects of a new standard or major amendment to a standard on investors, preparers, and auditors, following its issuance and application.
Keywords: International, Banking, IFRS 9, Post Implementation Review, Financial Instruments, IASB
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/763 that lays down implementing technical standards for supervisory reporting and public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
EBA published a report that examines the convergence of prudential supervisory practices in 2020 and offers conclusions of the EBA college monitoring activity.
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
The private sector working group of ECB on euro risk-free rates published the recommendations to address events that would trigger fallbacks in the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)-related contracts, along with the €STR-based EURIBOR fallback rates (rates that could be used if a fallback is triggered).
Bundesbank published a list of "EntryPoints" that are accepted in its reporting system; the list provides taxonomy version and name of the module against each EntryPoint.
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
The Sustainable Finance Taskforce of IOSCO held two roundtables, with global stakeholders, on the IOSCO priorities to enhance the reliability, comparability, and consistency of sustainability-related disclosures and to collect views on the practical implementation of a global system architecture for these disclosures.
Asia Pacific Australia Banking APS 111 Capital Adequacy Regulatory Capital Basel RBNZ APRA
ESMA published the final guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers.
EBA published annual data for two key concepts and indicators in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) Directive—available financial means and covered deposits.