FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event. In the letter to G20 leaders, Mr. Quarles notes that FSB will continue to act to address vulnerabilities in the financial system exposed by COVID-19 and the new and emerging risks. One of the reports provides a holistic review of the March market turmoil while the other report considers the financial stability impact and policy responses to the COVID-19 event. Both these reports have been delivered to G20 leaders ahead of their November Summit.
The report on holistic review of the March market turmoil finds that the breadth and dynamics of the economic shock and related liquidity stress in March were unprecedented. While stronger bank capital and liquidity positions, built over the past decade as a result of the post-crisis reforms, helped to prevent a sharp rise in counterparty risks, banks may have been unwilling or unable to deploy substantial balance sheet capacity in an uncertain and volatile environment. Dealers also faced difficulties absorbing large sales of assets, amplifying turmoil in short-term funding markets. Market dysfunction was exacerbated by the substantial sales of US Treasuries by some leveraged non-bank investors and foreign holders. Absent central bank intervention, it is highly likely that the stress in the financial system would have worsened significantly. The March turmoil underscores the need to strengthen the resilience of non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI). The review sets out an NBFI work program, which focuses on three main work areas: examining and addressing specific risk factors and markets that contributed to amplification of the shock; enhancing understanding of systemic risks in NBFI and the financial system, including interactions between banks and non-banks and cross-border spillovers; and assessing policies to address systemic risks in NBFI.
The report on financial stability impact and policy responses to COVID-19 event finds that global financial conditions have overall continued to ease since the G20 meeting in July on the back of the decisive policy action taken earlier this year. However, risks to global financial stability remain elevated. Deteriorating credit quality of non-financial borrowers poses risks to the financial sector. The intensification of the pandemic, together with the resulting necessary government containment measures as well as greater uncertainty about its duration, is increasing vulnerabilities in the non-financial sector. These vulnerabilities may increasingly affect banks and the supply of financing to the real economy. If banks face rising loan losses and a worsening in asset quality, they may be tempted to tighten credit conditions. In addition, further credit ratings downgrades could put bond markets under pressure. The report highlights that it is critical to address potential obstacles to the use of bank capital and liquidity buffers to absorb losses and support lending, while avoiding harmful deleveraging. The use of analytical tools such as stress testing is important to inform the assessment of potential solvency risks on financial stability and adjustments in policy responses. Authorities’ communication of their expectations of future policy, at a time when conditions are changing fast and the outlook is uncertain, is important to support confidence.
- Press Release
- Letter of FSB Chair (PDF)
- Report on Holistic Review (PDF)
- Report on Policy Responses (PDF)
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, COVID-19, NBFI, Systemic Risk, G20, Liquidity Risk, Stress Testing, Credit Risk, Financial Stability, FSB
Previous ArticleESRB Supports Extension of Macro-Prudential Measure by Swedish FSA
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.