PRA Issues Letter on Prudential Treatment of Legacy Instruments
Sarah Breeden of PRA published a letter to chief financial officers of UK deposit-takers regarding remediation of prudential treatment of legacy instruments before the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) transition period ends on December 31, 2021. In light of the EBA opinion published on October 21, 2020 on the prudential treatment of legacy instruments, PRA is requesting actions to address issues arising from the planned treatment of the affected legacy instruments of firms. Firms are requested to share an action plan with their usual supervisory contact by March 31, 2021.
PRA expects an affected firm to undertake a risk-based approach and assess appropriate remedial actions. If a firm intends to keep affected legacy instruments as non-regulatory capital and non-eligible liability instruments beyond the end of the CRR transition period, the action plan should include a reasoned analysis of any prudential risks, including concerns for resolvability or insolvency, and potential actions to mitigate those risks. A firm’s choice of remedial action may depend on a number of factors, including call options, governing law, issuing entity, and market conditions.
The letter emphasizes that PRA shares the EBA concerns on the issues of subordination provisions and flexibility of distribution payments, which contribute risks to the eligibility of firms’ own funds and eligible liabilities instruments. As explained in the supervisory statement SS7/13 on the quality of bank capital, PRA expects firms to avoid complex features and capital structures that may complicate prudential assessment and undermine the loss-absorbing properties of capital instruments and CRR compliance. PRA notes that firms are responsible for compliance with applicable regulations, such as the CRR and binding technical standards, taking into account the relevant guidance. PRA also refers firms to the BoE minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) Statement of Policy (SoP) that sets out the view that firms should consider whether having non-common equity tier 1 (CET1) own funds instruments that do not meet the relevant eligibility criteria for MREL resources could create difficulties for resolution. BoE may consider the challenges to resolvability presented by such instruments as part of assessing the resolvability of firms.
Related Link: Letter
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, Legacy Instruments, CRR, Regulatory Capital, MREL, Basel, PRA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Related Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
