The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) published a report on implications of the introduction of a carbon taxation on the investment portfolios of the Maltese financial system. The study focused on the climate transition risk, which could arise from the investments held in the portfolios of banks, insurance undertakings, and investment funds licensed in Malta. The research, conducted by the Financial Stability function within the MFSA, found that investment portfolios appeared, on the whole, to be resilient to carbon taxes—when assessed at six different taxation rates—although a few institutions could experience noteworthy losses.
In all of the six scenarios, the equity asset class was impacted the most should this carbon tax be introduced, followed by Collective Investment Schemes. Bonds tended to be less affected given that a tax is expected to have a small impact on the probability of default in instruments having a short-term maturity. The authors of the report noted that taking into consideration other assets held within the financial sector, such as the loan portfolio could result in different conclusions in terms of ultimate impact from transition risk. The report highlights that the adoption of timely and adequate policy measures is crucial to mitigate climate change risks, since this could avoid having to resort to immediate and forceful interventions at a later stage, which would inevitably harm the financial system through a disruptive shift to low-carbon assets.
The former strategy would allow market participants to perform smooth adjustments within their investment and business strategies to accommodate the changes without experiencing major losses, while the latter may trigger volatility in financial markets, possibly leading to a fire sale of carbon-intensive assets. The losses incurred in this "disorderly" scenario might be amplified in a highly interconnected system. Assessing climate risk over a short-term horizon can be used to identify the financial institutions’ resilience and vulnerabilities to climate risks. Although the short-term approach does not lead to the same comprehensive conclusions achievable under more sophisticated and long-term analyses, it indicates the level of urgency and prioritization in terms of policy intervention. Looking forward, future studies will attempt to address gaps, for example by expanding the study to include the carbon footprint of the loan portfolio of banks, delving into the companies’ trade-off between business model sustainability and absorption of any possible future carbon taxation policy. Furthermore, it would be beneficial to link this climate change analysis to possible contagion risk within the financial system.
Keywords: Europe, Malta, Banking, Securities, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Carbon Taxation, Investment Portfolio, MFSA
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Previous ArticleIOSCO Consults on Principles for Commodity Derivatives Markets
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.