FDIC published the three reports analyzing the growth of nonbank lending in the United States. The analyses suggest the shift in some lending from banks to nonbanks over the years; examine how corporate borrowing has moved between banks and capital markets; and focus on the migration of some home mortgage origination and servicing from banks to nonbanks. These reports have been featured in the FDIC Quarterly 2019 (Volume 13, Number 4).
Bank and Non-bank Lending Over the Past 70 Years
Since the 1970s, the share of bank loans fell as non-banks gained market share in residential mortgage and corporate lending, the report concludes. In other business lines, shifts in loan holdings from banks to non-banks was less pronounced as banks and non-banks continue to play important roles in lending for commercial real estate, agricultural loans, and consumer credit. Banks have regained market share of commercial real estate mortgages after a decline during the financial crisis, with the bank share of commercial mortgages being relatively steady at about 50% to 55% since the mid-1970s. In second quarter 2019, banks held 59% of commercial mortgages. In contrast, the bank share of multifamily residential mortgages decreased substantially between 1990 and 2012 and has modestly recovered since. The report highlights that the primary cause of the shift in loan origination from banks to non-banks is securitization. If less-regulated financial institutions play a larger role in lending, the shift may alter underwriting standards when loan demand increases. FDIC is also expected to publish a series of articles that look closely at the factors driving these trends and the related risks of residential mortgages and corporate debt and leveraged lending.
Leveraged Lending and Corporate Borrowing
The analysis examines the shift in corporate borrowing to capital markets over the past several decades. It also details the ways corporate debt has grown, the resulting risks this shift poses to banks since the 2008 financial crisis, and what factors could mitigate those risks. The report also discusses corporate bonds, including the role of banks in these markets and developing risks. It also details the macroeconomic risks banks face from corporate debt as well as potential risk-mitigating factors. The report finds that the shift from bank financing to capital market financing through bonds and leveraged loans could have implications for banking system stability. The shift may reduce banking risk, because when corporations rely less on direct bank loans, direct bank exposure to corporate borrower credit risk is reduced. However, banks are still vulnerable to corporate debt distress during an economic downturn in several ways:
- Higher corporate leverage built up through capital markets could reduce the ability of corporate borrowers to pay bank and nonbank debt in times of distress.
- Banks lend to nonbank financial firms that in turn lend to corporations, so if corporations default on loans from nonbank financial firms, then nonbank financial firms may default on loans from banks.
- In a downturn, bond issuances and leveraged loan syndications could decline, and any income that a bank had been earning from organizing bond issuances and leveraged loan syndications would be likely to decline.
- The migration of lending activity away from the regulated banking sector has increased competition for loans and facilitated looser underwriting standards and risky lending practices that could expose the financial system to new risks.
- Any macroeconomic effects of corporate debt distress could affect the ability of small businesses, which borrow more heavily from banks, to service their debt.
Trends in Mortgage Origination and Servicing
The report highlights that, post the 2007 financial crisis, mortgage market changed notably, with a substantive share of mortgage origination and servicing and some of the risk associated with these activities migrating outside of the banking system. Some risk remains with banks or could be transmitted to banks through other channels, including bank lending to non-bank mortgage lenders and servicers. Changing mortgage market dynamics and new risks and uncertainties warrant investigation of potential implications for systemic risk.
The characteristics of non-banks that have, in part, enabled them to gain a competitive edge in mortgage origination and servicing include continued reliance on short-term credit, a focus in conventional conforming and government (Federal Housing Administration or FHA in particular) loan origination, origination of loans exhibiting incrementally eased underwriting standards, application of technological innovation to improve efficiency and origination profits, and less comprehensive regulatory oversight relative to banks. Many nonbank characteristics subject these entities to several risks and the new competitive pressures facilitated by nonbanks have increased several risks in the financial system. These risks include the following:
- Liquidity and funding risks of the nonbank structure
- Interest rate risk inherent in refinancing-focused lending
- Risk of reduced availability of FHA-insured and other government loans in the case of widespread nonbank failures
- Moderate growth in credit risk caused by heightened competition in the market, driving incremental easing in historically tight credit standards
- Cyber-security and other risks related to increased reliance on technology
- Risks posed by the less stringent and more fragmented regulation of nonbanks relative to banks
- Press Release
- Report on Bank and Nonbank Lending (PDF)
- Report on Leveraged Lending (PDF)
- Report on Mortgage Origination and Servicing (PDF)
- FDIC Quarterly
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Insurance, Leveraged Lending, Credit Risk, Securitization, Mortgage Lending, Mortgage Origination, FDIC Quarterly, Commercial Real Estate, FDIC
Previous ArticleErkki Liikanen of IFRS on Impact of Big Tech on Financial Stability
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.