PRA published the consultation paper CP23/17 on financial management and planning by insurers. PRA is seeking views on the draft supervisory statement—which has been included in the Appendix to CP23/17—on effective financial management and planning by insurance firms and groups. PRA invites feedback on the proposals set out in CP23/17 by February 09, 2018.
The draft supervisory statement sets out the PRA expectations covering the framework for development and maintenance of a risk appetite statement by an insurer, the application of this risk appetite to an insurer’s business and financial plans, and the assessment of the suitability and sustainability of capital distribution plans in the context of this risk appetite. These proposals aim to set out how the application of effective risk management and governance may be linked together with the need for insurers to maintain a sound financial condition going forward. PRA considers that effective financial management and planning is especially important for insurers with a high risk appetite and for insurers with capital levels that may fluctuate significantly.
The draft supervisory statement is intended to complement existing policy material, rather than to set any new expectations on governance or risk management for insurers. The supervisory statement is drafted in the context of the Conditions Governing Business and Investments Parts of the PRA Rulebook and Articles 258–267 of the Solvency II Regulation (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35). It would sit alongside "The PRA’s approach to insurance supervision"; SS41/15, titled "Solvency II: applying EIOPA Set 2, System of Governance and ORSA Guidelines"; SS5/16 titled "Corporate Governance: Board responsibilities"; SS19/16 titled "Solvency II: ORSA"; and SS5/17 titled "Dealing with a market turning event in the general insurance sector." CP23/17 is relevant to all UK insurance firms and groups, in scope of the Solvency II Directive, and to the Society of Lloyd’s and managing agents.
Related Link: CP23/17 (PDF)
Previous ArticleFSB Report on the Financial Stability Implications from Fintech
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
PRA published updates in relation to the 2021 Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolio exercise.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
HKMA revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.