General Information & Client Services
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
November 09, 2017

European Parliament published a study on a new regime on sovereign concentration charges for banks’ sovereign exposures. The paper makes a concrete proposal for a Sovereign Concentration Charges Regulation (SCCR), including calibration and careful transitional arrangements to avoid any disorderly market impact.

Achieving the aim of Europe’s banking union project, to break the vicious circle between banks and sovereigns, requires new policy initiatives. The most direct bank-sovereign linkages are national deposit insurance and concentrated domestic sovereign exposures. Thus, simultaneously, with a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS) as proposed by the EC in 2015, the EU should introduce regulatory disincentives against highly concentrated sovereign exposures of euro area banks. The SCCR and EDIS together could realistically receive political approval in 2018 and be fully implemented within a decade. This paper outlines a workable design for the SCCR as the new EU legislation to be adopted as a complement of EDIS. The SCCR would add sovereign exposures above a certain threshold (defined as a ratio to tier 1 capital), weighted by a coefficient (sovereign concentration charge) that increases with the exposure ratio, to risk-weighted assets in the capital ratio’s denominator. The charges for concentrated sovereign exposures to different euro-area countries would add up. Sovereign exposures under 33% of tier 1 capital would be entirely exempt. The marginal capital charges on concentrated exposures would be mild for exposures of up to 100% of tier 1 capital and will rise more steeply above that level. Should this calibration turn out to have an insufficient impact, it could be strengthened at a later stage. 

The proposed transitional arrangements are also designed to ensure a smooth path toward the new regime, even if market conditions become less favorable. The transitional arrangements include extensive consultation with market participants, a gradual phase-in over a long period, and exemption from the concentration charges of all debt issued before the SCCR’s entry into force. While banks’ behavioral response to the new regime is impossible to predict with certainty, it is expected that most banks will respond to the introduction of the SCCR by diversifying their sovereign exposures away from their current home bias, but leaving them largely unchanged in euro-area aggregate. If so, the reform will neither materially impact banks’ prudential ratios nor entail any material costs. The adoption of the proposed SCCR, along with a full EDIS—ideally complemented by other reforms to increase risk-sharing and enhance market discipline in the banking policy framework—would significantly reduce bank-sovereign linkages and thus strengthen the Banking Union, foster greater EU financial integration, and increase financial stability for each member state and for the EU as a whole.

 

Related Link: Study on Sovereign Concentration Charges (PDF)

Keywords: Europe, Banking, SCCR, EDIS, Sovereign Exposures, Pillar 1, Study, European Parliament

Related Insights
News

IAIS Publishes Drafts of Revised ICP 8, ICP 15, ICP 16, and ICP 20

IAIS published the drafts of revised Insurance Core Principles on Public Disclosure (ICP 20), Investments (ICP 15), Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes (ICP 16), and Risk Management and Internal Controls (ICP 8), along with a revised draft of the glossary on enterprise risk management (ERM).

November 14, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

MAS Amends Notice 637 on Capital Adequacy Requirements in Singapore

MAS published the final, revised Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements in Singapore.

November 13, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ESMA Updates Q&A on Implementation of CSD Regulation and MAR

ESMA updated questions and answers (Q&A) documents on the implementation of the Central Securities Depository (CSD) Regulation and Market Abuse Regulation (MAR).

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Finalizes and Publishes the Cyber Lexicon

FSB published a cyber lexicon, following the public consultation earlier this year.

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SRB Updates Liability Data Reporting Template for 2019

SRB published version 2.7.1 of the Liability Data Reporting (LDR) Template.

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ECB to Conduct Comprehensive Assessment of Six Bulgarian Banks

ECB will undertake a comprehensive assessment of six Bulgarian banks. The exercise, comprising an asset quality review and a stress test, follows Bulgaria’s submission of a request to establish close cooperation with ECB on July 18, 2018.

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IMF Publishes Reports on the 2018 Article IV Consultation with Chile

IMF published its staff report and selected issues report under the 2018 Article IV consultation with Chile.

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Issues PS27/18 on Implementing the Extension of SM&CR to Insurers

PRA published the policy statement PS27/18, which provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP20/18, on implementing the extension of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) to insurers (Part 2).

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for November 2018

EBA published answers to seven questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Finalizes the Large Financial Institution Rating System

FED finalized the new supervisory rating system for Large Financial Institutions (LFIs), to better align with the current supervisory programs and practices for these firms.

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2204