November 09, 2017

EBA published an opinion and a report on matters related to the other financial intermediaries (OFIs) and the regulatory perimeter issues under the Capital Requirements Directive/Regulation (CRD IV/CRR). These matters include the use of Articles 2(5) and 9(2) CRD IV (Directive 2013/36/EU) and the interpretation of the terms “financial institution” and “ancillary services undertaking,” as defined in the CRR (Regulation (EU) No 575/2013). The EBA opinion is addressed to the European Parliament, Council, and the EC.

The opinion is based on the results of a detailed assessment, across the EU, of the prudential treatment of OFIs—that is, the entities carrying out credit intermediation activities that are not credit institutions nor other specified types of financial entity. The report published by EBA includes the results of the assessment of the use of Articles 2(5) and 9(2) CRD IV; the prudential treatment of OFIs under national law; the definitions of ancillary services undertaking and financial institution; and Annex I to the CRD IV. EBA's findings are relevant to the consideration of the legislative proposals to amend the CRD IV/CRR.

EBA undertook a comprehensive analysis of issues related to the regulatory perimeter further to the 2014 EBA Opinion and Report on the perimeter of credit institutions. This is in view of the need for the regular monitoring of credit intermediation activities outside the traditional banking sector and other developments such as the emergence of fintech. In terms of the overall scope of the CRD IV/CRR, EBA observes that Article 2(5) CRD IV remains valid and requires minor update. Also Article 9(2) CRD IV also appears to continue to have relevance in the member states and any amendment thereto ‎should be substantiated by a prior and thorough impact assessment. ‎As for the terms "financial institution" and "ancillary services undertaking," which are crucial for establishing the scope of prudential consolidation, EBA notes that these terms are prone to inconsistent interpretation across the EU, thus leading to potential divergences in the application of regulatory consolidation rules. EBA urges the institutions in EU to consider further possible amendments to the definitions of these terms, to ensure consistent treatment of prudential risks and to promote a level playing field.

EBA also notes a significant variation in the prudential treatment of OFIs under national laws. Although EBA is not making specific recommendations on the scope of individual prudential regulation under EU law, EBA observes the need to continue its monitoring work, including in conjunction with ESRB, as part of the annual shadow banking monitoring exercises. EBA highlights that Annex I to the CRD IV, which enlists the activities subject to mutual recognition, has been largely unchanged for 30 years and urges the EU institutions to consider clarifications and updates to the Annex.


Related Links

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Regulatory Perimeter, CRD IV, CRR, OFI, EBA

Related Articles
News

BCBS and IOSCO Extend Implementation of Final Phase of Margin Rules

BCBS and IOSCO agree to one-year extension of the final implementation phase of the margin requirements for non centrally cleared derivatives.

July 23, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Proposes Stronger Remuneration Requirements in Australia

APRA is proposing to strengthen prudential requirements for remuneration across all APRA-regulated entities in the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries by issuing CPS 511, a new prudential standard on remuneration.

July 23, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Consults on Availability of Group Own Funds Under Solvency II

PRA published a consultation paper (CP16/19) that sets out its proposed approach to the determination of the availability of subordinated liabilities and preference shares in group own funds.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EIOPA Consults on Methodological Principles for Insurer Stress Testing

EIOPA published a discussion paper on the methodological principles for stress testing the insurance sector in EU.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Adopt Rule to Exclude Community Banks from Volcker Rule

US Agencies (CFTC, FDIC, FED, OCC, and SEC) adopted a final rule to exclude community banks from the Volcker Rule, in line with amendments to certain sections of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Adopt Amendments to Simplify Regulatory Capital Rules

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that reduces regulatory burden by simplifying several requirements in the regulatory capital rules for banks.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IA of Hong Kong Delegates Inspection and Investigation Powers to HKMA

HKMA and IA of Hong Kong jointly issued a statement announcing the delegation of the inspection and investigation powers of IA to HKMA, pursuant to the statutory regulatory regime for insurance intermediaries under the Insurance Ordinance.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Extends Implementation Timeline for Policy Recommendations on SFTs

FSB announced adjustments to the implementation timelines for its recommendations on securities financing transactions (SFTs), specifically those related to the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared SFTs.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for July 2019

EBA published answers to six questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool this week.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Report Assesses Regulatory Framework for Fintech Activities

EBA published the findings of its analysis on the regulatory framework applicable to fintech firms when accessing the market.

July 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3494