EBA published an opinion and a report on matters related to the other financial intermediaries (OFIs) and the regulatory perimeter issues under the Capital Requirements Directive/Regulation (CRD IV/CRR). These matters include the use of Articles 2(5) and 9(2) CRD IV (Directive 2013/36/EU) and the interpretation of the terms “financial institution” and “ancillary services undertaking,” as defined in the CRR (Regulation (EU) No 575/2013). The EBA opinion is addressed to the European Parliament, Council, and the EC.
The opinion is based on the results of a detailed assessment, across the EU, of the prudential treatment of OFIs—that is, the entities carrying out credit intermediation activities that are not credit institutions nor other specified types of financial entity. The report published by EBA includes the results of the assessment of the use of Articles 2(5) and 9(2) CRD IV; the prudential treatment of OFIs under national law; the definitions of ancillary services undertaking and financial institution; and Annex I to the CRD IV. EBA's findings are relevant to the consideration of the legislative proposals to amend the CRD IV/CRR.
EBA undertook a comprehensive analysis of issues related to the regulatory perimeter further to the 2014 EBA Opinion and Report on the perimeter of credit institutions. This is in view of the need for the regular monitoring of credit intermediation activities outside the traditional banking sector and other developments such as the emergence of fintech. In terms of the overall scope of the CRD IV/CRR, EBA observes that Article 2(5) CRD IV remains valid and requires minor update. Also Article 9(2) CRD IV also appears to continue to have relevance in the member states and any amendment thereto should be substantiated by a prior and thorough impact assessment. As for the terms "financial institution" and "ancillary services undertaking," which are crucial for establishing the scope of prudential consolidation, EBA notes that these terms are prone to inconsistent interpretation across the EU, thus leading to potential divergences in the application of regulatory consolidation rules. EBA urges the institutions in EU to consider further possible amendments to the definitions of these terms, to ensure consistent treatment of prudential risks and to promote a level playing field.
EBA also notes a significant variation in the prudential treatment of OFIs under national laws. Although EBA is not making specific recommendations on the scope of individual prudential regulation under EU law, EBA observes the need to continue its monitoring work, including in conjunction with ESRB, as part of the annual shadow banking monitoring exercises. EBA highlights that Annex I to the CRD IV, which enlists the activities subject to mutual recognition, has been largely unchanged for 30 years and urges the EU institutions to consider clarifications and updates to the Annex.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Regulatory Perimeter, CRD IV, CRR, OFI, EBA
Previous ArticleAMF Consults on Capital Adequacy Requirements for Insurers
Next ArticleUS Agencies Published Semi-Annual Regulatory Agenda
APRA issued a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions announcing its intent to formalize the capital measures and reporting requirements for COVID-19 loans through temporary legislative instruments.
EBA is inviting relevant stakeholders, such as financial institutions and information and communication technology (ICT) third-party providers, to share their views and experience on the use of regtech solutions through its regtech industry survey.
BoE published a statistical notice (Notice 2020/9) explaining the approach for treatment of payment holidays on the profit and loss return or Form PL.
FASB announced the launch of its new Post-Implementation Review (PIR) web portal.
EBA revised the draft implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting as part of the reporting framework 3.0.
ECB published report that presents a summary of the analysis conducted on the internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP) practices of a sample of 37 "significant" banks.
BoE updated the known issues document for the statistical reporting Forms AS and FV.
FED announced individual capital requirements for 34 large banks and these requirements go into effect on October 01, 2020.
SRB published a set of documents to give operational guidance to banks on implementation of the bail-in tool.
BIS published an update on the G20 TechSprint Initiative, which was launched in April 2020 and aims to highlight the potential for technologies to resolve regulatory compliance (regtech) and supervisory (suptech) challenges.