EBA published a report that examines the progress toward addressing the nonperforming loan (NPL) issue in Europe. The report also takes stock of ongoing initiatives to tackle the NPL issue at the EU and the member state levels, identifies challenges to tackle the remaining NPL stock, and indicates possible areas where further action is needed. The report shows that NPL volumes have decreased by 50% since 2015, but country dispersion remains wide. The impediments to resolving NPLs remain significant in a few countries, particularly in the countries with higher NPL ratios.
The weighted average NPL ratio is 3% as of June 2019, compared with 6% in June 2015. This is the lowest ratio since EBA introduced a harmonized definition of NPLs across European countries. The report identified three pillars that determined the overall reduction in NPLs: supervisory attention and political determination to address the NPL issue effectively, efforts of banks to enhance NPL management capabilities, and positive economic growth. IFRS 9 data of on-balance-sheet and off-balance-sheet items also confirm the significant improvement achieved in asset quality. The share of stage 1 assets has been increasing relative to other stages and there was a limited migration from stage 1 to stages 2 or 3. To assess early warning signals, the report looks into the percentage of performing past-due loans and the movements toward a stage of lesser quality (for example, from stage 1 to stage 2 or 3). The share of stage 3 financial assets as of June 2019 was the highest in Greece (41%) and Cyprus (31%), followed by Portugal (9%).
Despite the significant improvement, dispersion of NPL ratios across countries remains wide. As of June 2019, Greece reported the highest NPL ratio (39.2%), followed by Cyprus (21.5%), while five additional countries had a NPL ratio above 5%. In comparison, in June 2015, 17 countries had reported NPL ratio above 5%, of which 10 countries had a double-digit ratio. Countries with high NPL ratios have larger share in past-due buckets of one year and more. These older NPLs are harder to cure, considerably devalued, and pose a significant risk to the banks that have an increased share of assets on their balance sheets. The differences in the speed recovery procedures across countries, caused by an inefficient legal framework and the lack of a market for NPLs, are the responses most often cited by the banks as impediments to the further resolution of NPLs. Furthermore, the legacy assets are still material and ongoing monitoring is required in the light of a weakening economic environment.
This is the second thematic report on NPLs and it follows the report that was published in July 2016. This report is based on supervisory data of asset quality metrics and is accompanied by a data visualization tool that provides a country-by-country analysis of the key asset quality metrics.
- Press Release
- Report on NPLs (PDF)
- Data Visualization Tool
- Statistical Annex (XLSX)
- First Report on NPLs (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, NPL, Credit Risk, NPE, IFRS 9, 90 Days Overdue, EBA
Previous ArticleOSFI Published the InfoPensions Newsletter in November 2019
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is consulting on the draft Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628), or FIRO, Code of Practice chapter on liquidity and funding in resolution, until March 14, 2022.
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) announced that the capital adequacy reporting as at December 31, 2021 must be done by February 11, 2022.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) announced that the guidelines on the reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures COVID-relief measures shall continue to apply until further notice.
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).