US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) issued a joint statement encouraging banks to prepare for the use of alternative reference rates for their lending activities. The agencies reiterate that they are not endorsing a specific replacement rate for the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for loans. For its loans, a bank may use any reference rate that it determines to be appropriate for its funding model and customer needs. However, the bank should include fallback language in its lending contracts to provide for the use of a robust fallback rate if the initial reference rate is discontinued.
The Alternative Reference Rates Committee recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as its preferred alternative for both cash and derivative transactions. The use of SOFR, however, is voluntary. Examiners will not criticize banks solely for using a reference rate other than the SOFR for loans. The agencies encourage banks to
- determine appropriate reference rates for lending activities and begin transitioning loans away from LIBOR without delay.
- accelerate outreach to lending customers to ensure that they are aware of, and prepared for, the transition from LIBOR.
- consider any technical changes that might be required for internal systems to accommodate new reference rates or fallback rates.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, LIBOR, Fallback Language, SOFR, Alternative Reference Rate Committee, Benchmark Reforms, US Agencies
Previous ArticleHKMA Consults on Implementation of Final Basel III Reform Package
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The EBA Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to ten questions.
ESMA updated the set of questions and answers (Q&A), along with the reporting instructions and an XML schema for the templates set out in the technical standards on disclosure requirements, under the Securitization Regulation.
EU published Regulation 2021/337, which amends the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EC), regarding the use of the single electronic reporting format for annual financial reports.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.