US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) issued a joint statement encouraging banks to prepare for the use of alternative reference rates for their lending activities. The agencies reiterate that they are not endorsing a specific replacement rate for the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for loans. For its loans, a bank may use any reference rate that it determines to be appropriate for its funding model and customer needs. However, the bank should include fallback language in its lending contracts to provide for the use of a robust fallback rate if the initial reference rate is discontinued.
The Alternative Reference Rates Committee recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as its preferred alternative for both cash and derivative transactions. The use of SOFR, however, is voluntary. Examiners will not criticize banks solely for using a reference rate other than the SOFR for loans. The agencies encourage banks to
- determine appropriate reference rates for lending activities and begin transitioning loans away from LIBOR without delay.
- accelerate outreach to lending customers to ensure that they are aware of, and prepared for, the transition from LIBOR.
- consider any technical changes that might be required for internal systems to accommodate new reference rates or fallback rates.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, LIBOR, Fallback Language, SOFR, Alternative Reference Rate Committee, Benchmark Reforms, US Agencies
Previous ArticleHKMA Consults on Implementation of Final Basel III Reform Package
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published further information related to its 2021 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), with additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is consulting on an Accounting Standards Update and the associated taxonomy improvements for requirements on troubled debt restructurings and vintage disclosures under the credit losses standard (for financial instruments) topic 326.
US Agencies issued a statement that summarizes the work undertaken during the interagency policy sprints focused on crypto-assets and provides a roadmap of future work related to crypto-assets.