US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) issued a joint statement encouraging banks to prepare for the use of alternative reference rates for their lending activities. The agencies reiterate that they are not endorsing a specific replacement rate for the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for loans. For its loans, a bank may use any reference rate that it determines to be appropriate for its funding model and customer needs. However, the bank should include fallback language in its lending contracts to provide for the use of a robust fallback rate if the initial reference rate is discontinued.
The Alternative Reference Rates Committee recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as its preferred alternative for both cash and derivative transactions. The use of SOFR, however, is voluntary. Examiners will not criticize banks solely for using a reference rate other than the SOFR for loans. The agencies encourage banks to
- determine appropriate reference rates for lending activities and begin transitioning loans away from LIBOR without delay.
- accelerate outreach to lending customers to ensure that they are aware of, and prepared for, the transition from LIBOR.
- consider any technical changes that might be required for internal systems to accommodate new reference rates or fallback rates.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, LIBOR, Fallback Language, SOFR, Alternative Reference Rate Committee, Benchmark Reforms, US Agencies
Previous ArticleHKMA Consults on Implementation of Final Basel III Reform Package
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.