EC adopted an explanatory note on the way the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) will work for listed companies in EU. Following requests from stakeholders, the note clarifies how to apply certain provisions of the EU law in the context of ESEF, including the audit of ESEF-compliant annual financial statements, the use of an electronic signature, and the responsibilities and liabilities of issuers. EC also published a set of frequently asked questions (FAQ) on ESEF. From 2021 onward, all listed companies in the EU will be able to use the ESEF—a new, single electronic document—when publishing their annual financial reports.
The aim of ESEF is to make it easier for listed companies to meet transparency requirements and ultimately to enhance transparency on the capital markets in EU. These provisions in the ESEF regulation stem from Directive Transparency Directive, Audit Directive, and Accounting Directive. In particular, the note provides:
- Clarifications on existing EU provisions concerning audit. The note clarifies that EU law requires statutory auditors to provide an audit opinion on whether the financial statements included in the annual financial reports comply with the relevant statutory requirements laid down in the ESEF Regulation. Under the Transparency Directive, third-country issuers are required to disclose annual financial reports drawn-up in accordance with all the requirements in the ESEF Regulation, together with an audit report prepared in accordance with the Audit Directive. As a result, it is the responsibility of a third-country issuer to ensure that its auditors provide an audit opinion on whether the financial statements included in the annual financial report comply with the relevant statutory requirements laid down in ESEF Regulation.
- Clarifications on EU provisions on use of an E-Signature. The note clarifies that the existing EU law does not prevent issuers or statutory auditors from using an e-signature for signing the annual financial reports, documents included therein, or the audit reports, respectively. In the absence of specific rules in force at the national or regulated market level, issuers and/or statutory auditors may apply their preferred option, including a handwritten or an e-signature.
- Clarifications on EU provisions on the responsibility and liabilities of issuers. The note clarifies that an issuer’s administrative, management, or supervisory body is responsible for drawing up and disclosing the annual financial reports in compliance with the ESEF Regulation. EU law does not prevent issuers from expressing, on a voluntary basis, for instance, in the responsibility statement within the annual financial report, a specific statement regarding the compliance of the annual financial report with the ESEF Regulation. EU law does not prevent issuers from disclosing additional versions of their annual financial reports that are non-ESEF compliant or that include ESEF-compliant financial statements for which compliance with ESEF was not checked by the statutory auditors. However, it should be made clear that these additional non-ESEF compliant versions of the annual financial reports constitute non-official versions.
The note also clarifies provisions concerning the use of ESEF files to fulfil other EU obligations. In case of a limited liability company with securities listed on the regulated markets in EU, the EU law does not prohibit the use of the audited financial statements prepared and published in accordance with the ESEF Regulation to fulfil legal obligations other than the ones stemming from the Transparency Directive. The EU law, therefore, does not prevent the implementation of national and/or administrative rules that would allow issuers to file the ESEF-compliant financial statements as accounting documents with a business register. Besides, the officially appointed mechanisms are also required to disseminate at least the ESEF-compliant annual financial reports submitted by issuers.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, ESEF, Q&A, EU Law, ESEF Regulation, Transparency Directive, iXBRL, EC
Previous ArticleUS Agencies Urge Banks to Use Fallback Language in Legacy Contracts
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) announced that the guidelines on the reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures COVID-relief measures shall continue to apply until further notice.
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) announced that the capital adequacy reporting as at December 31, 2021 must be done by February 11, 2022.
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0.