RBI published a circular announcing the decision to allow regional rural banks to issue Perpetual Debt Instruments eligible for inclusion as tier 1 capital, with a view to providing these banks with additional options for augmenting regulatory capital funds. This will help the regional rural banks to maintain the minimum prescribed Capital to Risk-weighted Assets Ratio (CRAR), besides meeting the increasing business requirements. The terms and conditions for issuance of Perpetual Debt Instruments have been provided in the Annex to the circular.
Regional rural banks are required to maintain a minimum CRAR of 9% on an ongoing basis. The capital funds for capital adequacy purpose shall consist of both tier 1 and tier 2 capital. The circular details limits on tier 1 capital as follows:
- The total tier 1 capital should not be less than 7% of risk-weighted assets after the regulatory adjustment/deduction as per paragraphs 3.1.4 and 3.1.5 of the circular.
- Of the minimum tier 1 capital of 7%, the Perpetual Debt Instruments will be limited to 1.5% of the total risk-weighted assets.
- Any additional amount raised through Perpetual Debt Instruments over and above 1.5% of the risk-weighted assets will also be reckoned as tier 1 capital, provided the bank complies with the minimum tier 1 capital of 7% of the risk-weighted assets before reckoning such additional amounts.
The circular provides information on deductions from Tier 1 Capital and Treatment of deferred tax assets. Additionally, the circular highlights that regional rule banks are not permitted to issue Perpetual Debt Instruments to retail investors/FPIs/NRIs, and invest in the Perpetual Debt Instruments of other banks, including the regional rural banks.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, India, Banking, Regulatory Capital, Tier 1 Capital, CRAR, Perpetual Debt Instruments, Capital Adequacy, Regional Rural Bank, RWA, RBI
Previous ArticleUS Agencies Propose to Amend Swap Margin Rule
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
In a response to the questions posed by a member of the European Parliament, the President Christine Lagarde highlighted the commitment of the European Central Bank (ECB) to an ambitious climate-related action plan along with a roadmap, which was published in July 2021.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) published the corrective version of the RUBA taxonomy Version 1.0.1, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.