SRB updated the minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) policy and published the MREL dashboard for the fourth quarter of 2020. The dashboard highlights that funding costs were slightly above the pre-pandemic levels between January and April 2021 and average MREL shortfalls against the final target amounted to 0.58% of total risk exposure amount (EUR 39.6 billion) when including the combined buffer requirement. In a separate development, SRB published a revised approach to the Public Interest Assessment (PIA) in resolution planning. SRB has updated its approach on how to conduct the PIA, to consider potential system-wide events when identifying the preferred resolution strategy and tools in the resolution plan.
The updated policy introduces a number of new elements and refinements, based on the changes required by the Banking Package and in light of the experiences during the 2020 resolution planning cycle. The regulatory framework for MREL was revised in 2019 through amendments to the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD; 2014/59/EU), the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRMR; 806/2014/EU), and the Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive (CRR and CRD), all of which comprise the Banking Package. The updated policy introduces MREL maximum distributable amount (MDA), policy criteria to identify systemic subsidiaries for which granting of an internal MREL waiver would raise financial stability concerns, and the approach to MREL-eligibility of UK instruments without bail-in clauses. The updated policy sets out minimum conditions to authorize certain types of cooperative networks to use eligible liabilities of associated entities other than the resolution entity to comply with the external MREL as well as minimum conditions to waive the internal MREL of the legal entities that are part of the cooperative network. The determination of the external and internal MREL must be fully aligned with the specific resolution strategy, in a way that supports the implementation of resolution action. The updated policy also refines the:
- Methodology to estimate the Pillar 2 requirements post-resolution—that is, one of the components used for MREL calibration
- MREL calibration on preferred versus variant resolution strategy, confirming that SRB computes MREL in line with the preferred strategy
- MREL calibration methodology for liquidation entities, where SRB clarifies that the loss absorption amount may increase beyond the default adjustment in proportion to financial stability concerns
- Press Release on MREL Policy and Dashboard
- Updated MREL Policy (PDF)
- MREL Dashboard (PDF)
- Press Release on PIA in Resolution Planning
- Revised PIA Approach (PDF)
- Article on PIA
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, MREL, MREL Dashboard, Resolution Planning, CRR2, BRRD2, Bail In, Public Interest Assessment, Regulatory Capital, Basel, SRMR2, Reporting, Resolution Framework, MREL Policy
Previous ArticleGLEIF Outlines Preparatory Steps to Implement New ROC Policies
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published answers to 29 questions in the Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool in September.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards