Featured Product

    CPMI and IOSCO Report on Implementation Monitoring of PFMI in US

    May 31, 2019

    CPMI and IOSCO published a Level 2 assessment report on the implementation monitoring of PFMI in United States. The assessment concludes that the legal, regulatory, and oversight frameworks for payment systems, central security depositories (CSDs), and securities settlement systems in the U.S. are complete and "consistent" with the Principles for financial market infrastructures (PFMI). Minor gaps have been identified in the frameworks for payment systems, CSDs, and securities settlement systems; however, these gaps are judged to have an immaterial impact on the assessment ratings.

  • The information to be provided by a third party seeking authorization to assess the compliance of securitizations with the STS criteria provided for in Securitization Regulation should enable a competent authority to evaluate whether and, to what extent, the applicant meets the conditions of Article 28(1) of the Securitization Regulation. An authorized third party will be able to provide STS assessment services across EU. The application for authorization should, therefore, comprehensively identify that third party, any group to which this third party belongs, and the scope of its activities. With regard to the STS assessment services to be provided, the application should include the envisaged scope of the services to be provided as well as their geographical scope, particularly the following:

    • To facilitate effective use of the authorization resources of a competent authority, each application for authorization should include a table clearly identifying each submitted document and its relevance to the conditions that must be met for authorization.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the fees charged by the third party are non-discriminatory and are sufficient and appropriate to cover the costs for the provision of the STS assessment services, as required by Article 28(1)(a) of Securitization Regulation, the third party should provide comprehensive information on pricing policies, pricing criteria, fee structures, and fee schedules.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party is able to ensure the integrity and independence of the STS assessment process, that third party should provide information on the structure of those internal controls. Furthermore, the third party should provide comprehensive information on the composition of the management body and on the qualifications and repute of each of its members.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party has sufficient operational safeguards and internal processes to assess STS compliance, the third party should provide information on its procedures relating to the required qualification of its staff. The third party should also demonstrate that its STS assessment methodology is sensitive to the type of securitization and that specifies separate procedures and safeguards for asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) transactions/programs and non-ABCP securitizations.

    The use of outsourcing arrangements and a reliance on the use of external experts can raise concerns about the robustness of operational safeguards and internal processes. The application should, therefore, contain specific information about the nature and scope of any such outsourcing arrangements or use of external experts as well as the third party's governance over those arrangements. Regulation (EU) 2019/885 is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by ESMA to EC.

     

    Related Links

    Effective Date: June 18, 2019

    Press Release
  • Proposed Rule 1
  • Proposed Rule 2
  • Proposed Rule 3
  • Presentation on Regulatory Framework (PDF)
  • Presentation on Resolution Plan Rules (PDF)
  • The assessment reflects the status of the U.S. legal, regulatory, and oversight framework as of March 30, 2018. The report presents a table that covers the identified gaps and recommendations. The assessment was conducted as a peer review from June 2018 to January 2019. The report complements a February 2015 report on central counterparties and trade repositories. The U.S. has now completed the Level 2 peer assessment process for the implementation of the PFMI. The U.S. authorities for the assessment were FED and SEC because of their role in the regulation, supervision, and oversight of payment systems and CSDs/securities settlement systems. 

    The rating framework used in Level 2 assessments is an adaptation of the approach described in the PFMI Assessment Methodology. The possible rating levels are “Consistent,” “Broadly consistent,” “Partly consistent,” “Not consistent,” and “Not applicable.” CPMI and IOSCO have also launched the PFMI Level 2 implementation database, which is a repository of all assessments completed to date. The database contains relevant implementation measures, ratings, gaps, and recommendations. It complements the assessment reports, which, starting with this U.S. evaluation, will provide descriptions of the principles and key considerations for which any gaps are identified and recommendations made. This database will be updated as new Level 2 assessments are completed.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, PMI, PFMI, Level 2 Assessment, Implementation Monitoring, CSD, CPMI, IOSCO

    Related Articles
    News

    HKMA Urges Early Action for Adherence to IBOR Fallbacks Protocol

    HKMA urged authorized institutions to take early action to adhere to the IBOR Fallbacks Protocol, which ISDA is expected to publish soon.

    October 16, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Sets Out Roadmap for Transition to Alternative Reference Rates

    FSB published a global transition roadmap for London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR).

    October 16, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HM Treasury Publishes Response to Proposal on BRRD2 Transposition

    HM Treasury published a document that summarizes the responses received from a consultation on the approach of UK to transposition of the revised Bank Resolution and Recovery Directive (BRRD2).

    October 15, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HM Treasury Publishes Response to Proposal on CRD5 Transposition

    HM Treasury published the government response to the feedback received on the consultation for updating the prudential regime of UK before the end of the Brexit transition period.

    October 15, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Updates Supervisory Statement on Counterparty Credit Risk

    PRA published the final policy statement PS22/20, which contains the updated supervisory statement SS12/13 on counterparty credit risk.

    October 14, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Update on Work to Address Market Fragmentation

    FSB published an update on its work to address market fragmentation. FSB is working in this area in collaboration with the other standard-setting bodies.

    October 14, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Proposes to Revise Guidelines on Incident Reporting Under PSD2

    EBA proposed revisions to the guidelines on major incident reporting under the second Payment Service Directive (PSD2).

    October 14, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Finalizes Standards for Prudential Treatment of Software Assets

    EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the methodology for prudential treatment of software assets by banks.

    October 14, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Roadmap on Cross-Border Payments, Report on Stablecoins

    FSB published a report presenting the roadmap to enhance cross-border payments by providing a high-level plan that sets ambitious but achievable goals and milestones in the five focus areas.

    October 13, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Urges Insurers to Prepare for End of Brexit Transition

    In a recent communication, EIOPA urged the insurance sector to complete its preparations for the end of the Brexit transition period on December 31, 2020.

    October 13, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5959