NBB published a communication on amendments to the existing national guidelines on the use of counterparty identification codes in the EBA reporting framework. Considering the recent clarifications on the use of counterparty identification codes in various tables in the new version of the EBA implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting, NBB wishes to amend these national guidelines to complement the European guidelines. This communication will apply from the reporting reference date of June 30, 2021.
In addition to the new requirements on identification codes, NBB is requesting the concerned institutions to apply the following “cascade system”:
- Institutions are asked to always provide a Legal Entity Identifier, or LEI, code to identify their counterparties in the reporting (insofar as a LEI code is available for these counterparties)
- If there is no LEI code available for a counterparty, a national code should be used. For Belgian counterparties, this should be the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE) number
- Only if there is no LEI or national code (the CBE number for Belgian counterparties) available for a counterparty, an internal code will be requested. In that case, institutions will be asked to use the existing "Gggg(g)(g) code" (as provided for in Communication NBB_2014_05 on the use of counterparty identification codes).
In a separate circular, NBB specified that it is integrating the EBA guidelines on tri-party repurchase agreements (EBA/GL/2021/01) into its supervisory practice. The EBA guidelines specify conditions for the application of alternative treatment of exposures related to tri-party repurchase agreements for large exposure purposes, as set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). These guidelines will apply from June 28, 2021.
- Communication on Identification Codes (PDF in English)
- Circular on Application of EBA Guidelines (in French)
Keywords: Europe, Belgium, Banking, Reporting, LEI, Large Exposures, Basel, CRR, Credit Risk, Repo, Triparty Repo, EB
Previous ArticleBoE and PRA Revise Resolution Policy for Banks
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published answers to 29 questions in the Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool in September.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards